Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-22 Thread samuel.ferencik
-Original Message- From: Chris Barker - NOAA Federal [mailto:chris.bar...@noaa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:47 PM To: Ferencik, Samuel: Markets (PRG) Cc: distutils-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows On Mon, Aug 19

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:18 AM, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote: It seems distutils.util.get_platform() semantically differs on Windows and Linux. Windows: the return value is derived from the architecture of the *interpreter*, hence for 32-bit

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:15 PM, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote: What does your 'uname -m' return? x86_64 Is it possible you're really running a 32-bit Python on a *32-bit* OS X kernel? [http://superuser.com/q/161195] nope -- I am

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-22 Thread samuel.ferencik
-Original Message- From: Ronald Oussoren [mailto:ronaldousso...@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:21 PM To: Ferencik, Samuel: Markets (PRG) Cc: chris.bar...@noaa.gov; distutils-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-20 Thread samuel.ferencik
-Original Message- From: Chris Barker - NOAA Federal [mailto:chris.bar...@noaa.gov] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 7:13 PM To: Ferencik, Samuel: Markets (PRG) Cc: distutils-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-20 Thread Donald Stufft
...@noaa.gov] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 7:13 PM To: Ferencik, Samuel: Markets (PRG) Cc: distutils-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:18 AM, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote: It seems

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-20 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:00 AM, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote: That's strange. I'm on Python 3.3.1, and it seems to me that get_platform() derives the value from uname for OS X, similar to Linux. (osname, host, release, version, machine) = os.uname() ... elif osname[:6]

Re: [Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-20 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:15 PM, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote: What does your 'uname -m' return? x86_64 Is it possible you're really running a 32-bit Python on a *32-bit* OS X kernel? [http://superuser.com/q/161195] nope -- I am quite deliberately running a 32 bit Python on my 64

[Distutils] distutils.util.get_platform() - Linux vs Windows

2013-08-17 Thread samuel.ferencik
Hi, It seems distutils.util.get_platform() semantically differs on Windows and Linux. Windows: the return value is derived from the architecture of the *interpreter*, hence for 32-bit Python running on 64-bit Windows get_platform() = 'win32' (32-bit). Linux: the return value is derived from