Re: [Distutils] optional binary compilation under future installation tools

2012-09-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:44 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On 9/13/12 10:15 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: > > Some packages we maintain currently provide largely identical > > side-by-side implementations of features: one implementation is written > > in C, the other implementation is written in Python.

Re: [Distutils] optional binary compilation under future installation tools

2012-09-13 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On 9/13/12 10:15 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: Some packages we maintain currently provide largely identical side-by-side implementations of features: one implementation is written in C, the other implementation is written in Python. The C module is just an optimized version of the Python code. Th

[Distutils] optional binary compilation under future installation tools

2012-09-13 Thread Chris McDonough
Some packages we maintain currently provide largely identical side-by-side implementations of features: one implementation is written in C, the other implementation is written in Python. The C module is just an optimized version of the Python code. There is logic at module scope within modules in