On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Mar 18, 2013, at 04:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Eventually I expect pip will grow a --wheel-only option to run it in
strict installer only mode, but
It's possible to upload broken wheels. I don't want I had to find the
disable flag to be anyone's first impression.
On Mar 19, 2013 7:40 PM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Barry Warsaw
On Mar 19, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
It's possible to upload broken wheels. I don't want I had to find the
disable flag to be anyone's first impression.
It's possible to upload broken sdists, too.
Trust me, Windows' users (who do not have C compilers) impression
we might do different defaults for each platform
On Mar 19, 2013 8:33 PM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
It's possible to upload broken wheels. I don't want I had to find the
disable flag to be anyone's first impression.
On Mar 16, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
Earlier today we merged the existing wheel branch into mainline pip.
This adds opt-in wheel install support (built into pip, pip install
--use-wheel ...) and the convenient pip wheel ... command for
creating the wheels you
On 18 March 2013 09:08, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
My understanding is that in order to achieve this nirvana, what we must do
is:
(Daniel may wish to chime in with more details)
A twisted developer, on each supported Windows configuration, must 'pip
install wheel; pip wheel
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
the pip docs have a cookbook entry now for the wheel support
http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/cookbook.html#building-and-installing-wheels
the usage reference is up to date as well
I still think it is unfortunate that we are starting to extend pip to
be a tool for developers to create distributions. It would be better
of pip was kept as an install tool, and we added the utilities for
creating distributions separate.
I understand where you're coming from, but a few
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
The other option is of course that we start adding all sorts of
development commands to pip, such as build, test, sdist etc. But I do
think it's the wrong place.
I've thought of that too, but that's a discussion for
On 3/18/2013 5:16 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
Earlier today we merged the existing wheel branch into mainline pip.
This adds opt-in wheel install support (built into pip, pip install
--use-wheel ...) and the convenient pip
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
On 3/18/2013 5:16 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
Earlier today we merged the existing wheel branch into mainline pip.
This adds opt-in wheel install
On Mar 18, 2013, at 02:16 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I still think it is unfortunate that we are starting to extend pip to
be a tool for developers to create distributions. It would be better
of pip was kept as an install tool, and we added the utilities for
creating distributions separate.
+1.
On Mar 18, 2013, at 04:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Eventually I expect pip will grow a --wheel-only option to run it in
strict installer only mode, but the ecosystem is a long way from
supporting that being a useful option (especially since there are some
cases which will still require falling
On Mar 18, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Mar 18, 2013, at 04:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Eventually I expect pip will grow a --wheel-only option to run it in
strict installer only mode, but the ecosystem is a long way from
supporting that being a useful option
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
1) pip is *currently* very much a build tool in that it build/installs from
source archives, but I understand the new model is for pip to eventually be
working with pre-built wheels much of the time, with no build system
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Mar 18, 2013, at 04:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Eventually I expect pip will grow a --wheel-only option to run it in
strict installer only mode, but the ecosystem is a long way from
supporting that being a useful option
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
1) pip is *currently* very much a build tool in that it build/installs from
source archives, but I understand the new model is for pip to eventually be
I do understand the confusion. Binary package formats have more than
one use. Coincidentally we have implemented the slightly different
cache compiles and distribute software features using the same
format. It might help if you can imagine that pip wheel produces a
different format than python
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
I do understand the confusion. Binary package formats have more than
one use. Coincidentally we have implemented the slightly different
cache compiles and distribute software features using the same
format. It might help if
the pip docs have a cookbook entry now for the wheel support
http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/cookbook.html#building-and-installing-wheels
the usage reference is up to date as well
http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/usage.html
Marcus
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Daniel Holth
Earlier today we merged the existing wheel branch into mainline pip.
This adds opt-in wheel install support (built into pip, pip install
--use-wheel ...) and the convenient pip wheel ... command for
creating the wheels you need.
pip wheel ... uses the wheel reference implementation (pip install
21 matches
Mail list logo
