Re: [Distutils] platform_python_implementation not implemented.

So stepping back to the original question On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:11 PM, MinRK wrote: > Hello, > > I’m working on specifying dependencies for a project (IPython) that are > dependent on the Python implementation - we want to depend on a package on > CPython, but not on PyPy. I see from PEPs 3

Re: [Distutils] platform_python_implementation not implemented.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Holth wrote: > That is too bad. markerlib was added to pkg_resources as _markerlib in 2012. > It is used for .dist-info metadata as present in wheel. Then, only to > implement markers to setup.py or .egg-info style metadata, pkg_resources > gains its inline

Re: [Distutils] platform_python_implementation not implemented.

That is too bad. markerlib was added to pkg_resources as _markerlib in 2012. It is used for .dist-info metadata as present in wheel. Then, only to implement markers to setup.py or .egg-info style metadata, pkg_resources gains its inline markers implementation in 2013, including its own definitions

[Distutils] platform_python_implementation not implemented.

Hello, I’m working on specifying dependencies for a project (IPython) that are dependent on the Python implementation - we want to depend on a package on CPython, but not on PyPy. I see from PEPs 345 and 426