2014-12-02 12:55 GMT+01:00 Alan McConchie alan.mcconc...@gmail.com:
However, I think the tone of the emails on this list still need to be
dealt with.
+1, honestly, I finally understand why some people push for a code of
conduct. In almost 7 years on OSM mailing lists and conventions I have
Thanks for your thoughtful words, Alan.
Yes, I and Alyssa are the moderators.
I’m afraid I’m still getting caught up. (Haven’t even had coffee yet!) I saw
the first couple of e-mails in the thread last night, but no more until this
morning, and I’m afraid I don’t know what “other thread”
Darrell,
without going into the specifics of this case, there's one bit in
your message that had a bad taste for me.
What you have essentially done is elevate Serge's message to almost
extreme violation status because you've decided to sanction
immediately, rather than just going through the
On 12/2/2014 3:22 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Your justification for this seems to be behaviour outside of this list
and/or, and this is the bit I take particular offense with,
The private responses to me have generally expressed that is part of a
pattern of behavior, and not an isolated incident.
+1 what Frederik said. Thanks, saved me some typing there.
We seem to have calmed down, I thought Mele had some very helpful advice.
We can all help to drag up the baseline of civility after this painfully
illustrative incident.
To me this looks like a pre-emptive attempt at a decision which
On 12/2/2014 5:04 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Am I to understand that felt Serge's comments were acceptable
behavior? I was expecting to find that you at least didn't condone it.
but sadly no where did you say Serge's comments were unacceptable.
No where did I say that his comments were acceptable
