On 10/11/2014 3:48 PM, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
Here’s my question, and this needs to be clarified (probably deserves its own
thread):
Who is responsible for deciding what action needs to be taken in the case of
CoC violations?
A CoC without a body willing and able to enforce it is just
2014-10-11 23:48 GMT+01:00 Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org:
On Oct 10, 2014, at 19:45, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
One last thought - where would the forums fit in this? They're on
openstreetmap.org, but not run by the OSMF, so the forum admins would be
perfectly capable of saying
On 10/8/2014 8:49 PM, Jo Walsh wrote:
Okay, my gloss on this is that the Code of Conduct is a kind of
shibboleth and a kind of insurance policy.
You need one in order to be seen taking this stuff seriously
The argument raised recently was that having a CoC helps diversity, and
is not a
I'm not arguing for an exception for unacceptable behavior, but I am
saying that we need to be cognizant of a few issues:
1. Whereas the Code of Conduct presumes that most behavior is done
with full knowledge and intent, we cannot really assume that. We can't
assume that if someone is behaving in
A few quick comments (more thoughtful ones hopefully to follow).
1. Whereas the Code of Conduct presumes that most behavior is done
with full knowledge and intent, we cannot really assume that. We can't
assume that if someone is behaving in a way that we dislike, that it
must be purposeful.
I think the right way forward is to focus on directed efforts, rather
than try to have a single, unified code of conduct at the start.
This is for a few reasons:
1. I tried to create a CoC from the top down in 2010. It didn't work.
People don't like top down things imposed upon them.
2. There
