limodou wrote:
>>
>> As soon as it matures let's create a repository for reusable Django apps.
>
> Wow, another amazing idea.
This is actually how it all started. Many people in Django community
implemented really good applications (hugo, sune, limodou, ...) but in
order to reuse them we have
On 4/7/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Finally! :-)
>
> Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > On the plane from London to Chicago yesterday, I implemented something
> > that's been discussed on this list lately -- "reverse" URL creation.
>
> On conceptual level it looks similar to what I s
Finally! :-)
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On the plane from London to Chicago yesterday, I implemented something
> that's been discussed on this list lately -- "reverse" URL creation.
On conceptual level it looks similar to what I started to implement for
my site with a small insignificant differen
On 4/6/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great! But whether the syntax can be more easier when we used it in
> views or other source code? I think the tag used in template is simple
> enough. Maybe be there should be an easy helper function like `link`
> to do that. Just like:
>
> >>> from
On 4/7/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the plane from London to Chicago yesterday, I implemented something
> that's been discussed on this list lately -- "reverse" URL creation.
>
> I've attached a new urlresolvers.py to this e-mail. It's intended to
> replace the one in django
On 4/6/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That way if you set up your URLconfs in a logical manner -- I'd bet
> 90% of my urlconfs already work this way -- the shortcut version
> would Just Workâ˘.
Unfortunately the Generic Views don't fit this too well...
'object_id' is not 'id'.
I just had another thought on this:
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Ideally there'd be a template-tag interface to this. Something like:
>
> {% link 'path.to.month_view' 2005 'apr' %}
> {% link 'path.to.person_view' state='il' name='adrian' %}
One thing we could do -
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On the plane from London to Chicago yesterday, I implemented something
> that's been discussed on this list lately -- "reverse" URL creation.
Wow.
This is frickin' amazing, Adrian; it's exactly what I kept trying to
come up with and couldn't
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>Ideally there'd be a template-tag interface to this. Something like:
>
>{% link 'path.to.month_view' 2005 'apr' %}
>{% link 'path.to.person_view' state='il' name='adrian' %}
>
>
It's unbelievable :-). I was thinking about it just 15 minutes ago but
only with 'ur
On the plane from London to Chicago yesterday, I implemented something
that's been discussed on this list lately -- "reverse" URL creation.
I've attached a new urlresolvers.py to this e-mail. It's intended to
replace the one in django/core, and it works with magic-removal only.
(To use it with tru
JP Farias wrote:
>Hmmm... Some question come to my mind now...
>
>1. Does django uses only one connection for the whole process?
>
>2. Does it open and close a connection once for every request?
>
>
The second is true.
>3. Can django handle many requests at once (multi-threaded or something
>e
On Thursday 06 April 2006 17:38, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About magic-removal--I have defined a ForeignKey? with
> limit_choices_to for, say, "somefield". Now, when I do:
>
> someobject.somefield
>
> the resulting query to the related object does not use this
> limitation. Shouldn't it do
Hi,
About magic-removal--I have defined a ForeignKey? with limit_choices_to
for, say, "somefield". Now, when I do:
someobject.somefield
the resulting query to the related object does not use this limitation.
Shouldn't it do this? Hmm, this is a "how is it supposed to work"
question, so I'd li
Hmmm... Some question come to my mind now...
1. Does django uses only one connection for the whole process?
2. Does it open and close a connection once for every request?
3. Can django handle many requests at once (multi-threaded or something
else)?
--
JP
--~--~-~--~~---
"Istvan Albert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't understand how the traceback module ends up being None
>
>> Adding a check for None will make the warning message go away
>
> fixing up code to make a mysterious error message go away is vey very
> suboptimal (ok ... so I've done I it myself a
15 matches
Mail list logo
