If so, is the source available for download?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On 9/28/06, Filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice if it replaced a wider range of characters? not
> sure how useful it would be, but i think some unusual characters may
> not be displayed correctly if not escaped.
The five characters that 'escape' transforms correspond to the
Hi,
The filter docs say for the "escape" filter:
Escapes a string's HTML. Specifically, it makes these replacements:
* "&" to ""
* < to ""
* > to ""
* '"' (double quote) to ''
* "'" (single quote) to ''
Wouldn't it be nice if it replaced a wider range
On 9/28/06, shaunc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd think that Field.validate should at least call explicitly set
> validators. (Best, perhaps, would be for it to call validate_explicit,
> and validate_default -- where subclasses override validate_default to
> change behavior on a per-class
I believe the following code should print "FOO", but it doesn't. This
seems to be because django.db.models.fields.Field.validate does nothing
(and IntegerField doesn't override this).
I'd think that Field.validate should at least call explicitly set
validators. (Best, perhaps, would be for it to