On 4/8/07, Ceph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's an open ticket currently regarding custom error messages in
> newforms: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3457
>
> I currently have an ugly hack in place that gives me an error_message=
> parameter for the field types I use, but, it's ugly,
On 4/8/07, Max Battcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a magic numbers (avoidance) framework. I know this is going to
> sound like a joke, but what about calling it
> django.contrib.magic_numbers?
But we've *removed* the magic!
:)
I like the idea of thinking out of the box, though, along th
> I'm glad you like it! I really hope it does help many other people who
> have a need for something like this. I'm very eager to hear what other
> thoughts and questions you (and anyone else!) have about it. I'm glad
> to clarify.
>
> -Gul
Good timing! I was planning to look to something like th
On 4/8/07, Gulopine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * The name "values" is a bit too abstract -- it took me a while to
> > figure out exactly what this framework *does*. Maybe something like
> > "editable constants" or "model-specific options" would be more clear.
>
> I will admit that I never re
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 15:40 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You must mean those:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1714
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/342
>
> I'm currently trying to create a patch but I'm not really confortable
> with changing options so I'd rather have input f
> * The name "values" is a bit too abstract -- it took me a while to
> figure out exactly what this framework *does*. Maybe something like
> "editable constants" or "model-specific options" would be more clear.
I will admit that I never really had a clear idea on what to call it.
I knew going in
There's an open ticket currently regarding custom error messages in
newforms: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3457
I currently have an ugly hack in place that gives me an error_message=
parameter for the field types I use, but, it's ugly, and doesn't work
entirely. I'm working on getting a r
On 4/7/07, Gulopine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/django-values/
>
> It is essentially an entire subframework, but it exists entirely as a
> contrib app, utilizing newforms and standard Django permissions for
> its value editor, and supplying class attributes for direct use
Jure Čuhalev wrote:
> I was receiving same error. The problem happened when I tried to
> upload a file that was gzipped. After attaching plain-text patch it
> worked. I have a session with my name inside trac.
>
> Hope this helps in debugging.
The problem is with Trac:
http://trac.edgewall.org/
On 4/7/07, Baptiste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how that was before, but with your commits of today, I
> can't access the list of some models (some others still work), because
> of the error : 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'manager' (/django/
> contrib/admin/filterspecs.py in __
I was receiving same error. The problem happened when I tried to
upload a file that was gzipped. After attaching plain-text patch it
worked. I have a session with my name inside trac.
Hope this helps in debugging.
regards,
jure
On 3/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trac d
Find Your Programming Job Vacancy and resources here -->
http://www.jobbankdata.com/job-programming.htm
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
You must mean those:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1714
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/342
I'm currently trying to create a patch but I'm not really confortable
with changing options so I'd rather have input from the devs.
Currently, "editable=False" for a field really means privat
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:16:00PM +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 4/7/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Attached is a patch that re-implements __repr__ using an iterator over the
> > object. Thus, SortedDict's are displayed properly in the Python shell.
>
> Hi Forest,
>
>
On 4/8/07, Simon G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that the plan for 1.1 is to rewrite Django in Lisp or
> Haskell. Or is Scheme the cool one now?
Erlang!
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
I believe that the plan for 1.1 is to rewrite Django in Lisp or
Haskell. Or is Scheme the cool one now?
j/k
--Simon
On Apr 8, 4:34 am, "Noah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm worried about a trend I've seen before in other frameworks etc.
> They start off easier to use and over time get more an
This was reported way back in the triple-digit days:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/987
I took a couple of stabs at it a while ago. I patched
HttpResponseRedirect to prepend the domain to the current site
specified by settings.SITE_ID, as long as it's not the default
"example.com" (anyone
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:52 +0200, Matias Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
> Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > On 4/6/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> We currently have a bug in HttpResponseRedirect: the HTTP spec requires
> >> using absolutely URLs in the Location header for redirects
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 4/6/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> We currently have a bug in HttpResponseRedirect: the HTTP spec requires
>> using absolutely URLs in the Location header for redirects.
>>
>
> This is a tricky one... Ideally, HttpResponseRedirect would a
As very little seems to happen in the field of sqlalchemy, I started
to experiment on my own.. But my approach is about the opposite of the
one that has mostly been proposed. But then again, my goal has been
different as well, most important for me was to be able to use the
query language with mor
20 matches
Mail list logo