Re: Oracle patch is ready

2007-04-30 Thread world_domination_kites
Ben/Ian/Matt, re: SELECT DISTINCT LOBdata in Oracle I have seen "select distinct myLOB" done in Oracle as "select distinct first4kchar(myLOB)", where first4kchar() takes a LOB argument and return's the first 4000 characters in a varchar2 type. Could dig up the PL/SQL, ask me for it if you are in

Re: Merge some branches in before 1.0?

2007-04-30 Thread James Bennett
On 4/30/07, Simon G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've warned people off using the svn version to run production sites > because of the post-1.0 code breakage that's going to be happening. > So, we don't need to worry as much about stability of trunk, since > 0.96 is the stable, recommended versi

Re: Merge some branches in before 1.0?

2007-04-30 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 4/30/07, Simon G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've warned people off using the svn version to run production sites > because of the post-1.0 code breakage that's going to be happening. > So, we don't need to worry as much about stability of trunk, since > 0.96 is the stable, recommended versi

Re: Merge some branches in before 1.0?

2007-04-30 Thread David Danier
> There are a number which look so close (Oracle, FullHistory, > GenericAuth), [...] I started to read the code of FullHistory and GenericAuth, because I needed this for my own project some time ago. So I try to comment on these two. Perhaps I can help finishing both, as I implemented this functi

Merge some branches in before 1.0?

2007-04-30 Thread Simon G.
Just thinking out loud here - We've warned people off using the svn version to run production sites because of the post-1.0 code breakage that's going to be happening. So, we don't need to worry as much about stability of trunk, since 0.96 is the stable, recommended version. Therefore, why don't

Re: GSoC status?

2007-04-30 Thread David Larlet
2007/4/29, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 4/28/07, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just hope those ones will be successful! Maybe we can learn from the > > past and improve students/dev communication in order to help them a > > bit more if they need it? > > I think for the mo

Re: Removing leading and trailing whitespace in forms.CharField clean method

2007-04-30 Thread ludvig.ericson
On Apr 29, 7:06 pm, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/29/07, Mike Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any interest or value in removing leading and trailing > > whitespace as part of the forms.CharField clean method? > > I don't think it's a good idea to offer this

Re: Disable admin pagination completely: discussion for ticket #4027

2007-04-30 Thread Ben Ford
Hi Marek, I wrote a patch a while back that implemented a 'number per page widget' for admin. It never really went anywhere as it needed a better patch and some tests, which I didn't have the time to supply. I don't know if you would find this useful, let me know if you like and I can send you the

Disable admin pagination completely: discussion for ticket #4027

2007-04-30 Thread Marek Kubica
Hi all, I created a new ticket with the need to disable pagination in the admin object listing altogether. The current default value for pagination is 100 objects per page, which can of course be extended to sys.maxint and is surely enough but this leaves an odd feeling. In the ticket I put up di

Re: loading.py - get_apps(), get_app() and load_app()

2007-04-30 Thread Vinay Sajip
> Only the first time. On subsequent calls, it returns the cached list of > installed apps without calling load_app() at all. Yep, noticed that. > The double call isn't explicitly intentional or unintentional; it's just > an implementation detail. Currently get_apps() returns a list of all > app