Re: Proposal: Let session support backends

2007-06-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 6/6/07, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds great, but memcached is a cache rather than a persistent store, > so it doesn't guarantee to be able to give you back the data. Is it OK for > a session to drop because memcached flushed it out? Or are you assuming you > can size y

Re: Proposal: Let session support backends

2007-06-06 Thread Ned Batchelder
It sounds great, but memcached is a cache rather than a persistent store, so it doesn't guarantee to be able to give you back the data. Is it OK for a session to drop because memcached flushed it out? Or are you assuming you can size your memcached servers so that they never drop a session?

Re: Proposal: Let session support backends

2007-06-06 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 6/6/07, Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone seriously considering making a framework for this? I, for one, would be all for a (drop-in, API-compatible) session layer replacement with pluggable backends. Memcached sessions are a Good Idea. Jacob --~--~-~--~~~-

Re: Proposal: Let session support backends

2007-06-06 Thread Faulkner
Am having similar thoughts but instead of memory I want to use a distributed cache. I'm starting to tinker with making my own session middleware, but if someone was making a pluggable framework for sessions I'd far prefer to use that. Anyone seriously considering making a framework for this?

Re: Design Decision: Dynamic settings.SITE_ID (ref. #4438)

2007-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malcolm: We have currently implemented a Middleware Hack to alter the settings.SITE_ID The problem being that our project is serving more then 10 domain names and we are aiming at about 1200 requests/second. We don't want to hesitate when the load gets high, to through another App Server to hand

I would like to sell my web page - You can run your own business with this web page!

2007-06-06 Thread GPcapital
I do not want to cheat anybody. I'm a student from Czech republic and made that web page in my spare time. My web page GPCapitalGroup.com has spent about 100 hours and my direct costs reach approximatelly $150 only for buying webhosting and domain. In case, you would like to buy that web page wit

Re: GSoC 2007: Check Constraints Update

2007-06-06 Thread Justin Bronn
Thejaswi, > Problem: > The check constraints got added successfully (after a syncdb) but the > problem is when I go to the admin page and to the model's page in it, > I get an error ... This error vanishes when I comment the check fields > in the models.py. I don't understand why the Check (pseud

Re: multiple-db-support

2007-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A few weeks back there was a discussion about providing support for alternative database usage scenarios in Django and around that time another user Carole Zieler (carole.zieler) had offered to do some maintenance on the branch. I don't think she ever received a response back and subsequently has

GSoC 2007: Check Constraints Update

2007-06-06 Thread Thejaswi Puthraya
Hello everyone, It's been a good week, I have been able to make quite some progress (about the quality of work, you'll have to comment). Here is the brief procedure that I adopted to implement Check constraints. 1) Created a Check field that inherits the Field Class and here I wrote the various a