On 9/9/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would seem this broke reloading of the built-in web server.
I've fixed that in [6094].
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
Hi folks,
I think I can be free for most of Friday (Indonesian time GMT+6). I'd like
to suggest focusing my time to get the multi-db branch as up to date as
possible, I would imagine that up to the backend refactoring at the very
least, it's up to 5589 on my machine right now so an extra push to 59
On Jun 11, 7:56 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 6/11/07, Don Arbow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Did you search Trac? This looks like it's already been proposed and a
> > patch submitted:
>
> >http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2066
>
> Yeah, I tried that code and foun
On 9/11/07, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Nis Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't like the transformation of strings into field values. How would
> > you compare a field value to a string?
>
> Exactly my reason for not making it a method of BaseForm. If thin
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 18:25 -0500, Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> There's a ticket in Trac to override the BaseForm in the admin
> add/change views of the newforms admin branch. [1] It seems to me that
> it would also be useful to override the actual Form object, and to do
> so based on information in
There's a ticket in Trac to override the BaseForm in the admin
add/change views of the newforms admin branch. [1] It seems to me that
it would also be useful to override the actual Form object, and to do
so based on information in the request. I think we should add a couple
of methods to ModelAdmi
On 9/10/07, Benjamin Slavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marty's suggestion looks promising and seems to have a good bit of
> support from the core devs. It's been a few months, and I am
> wondering if there has been any movement on this.
This particular item has been low on my list of prioritie
Hello all,
On 6/1/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, there's a bit more to chew on; hopefully we can come up with some
> final thoughts on this soon, because I'd love to see this happen.
Marty's suggestion looks promising and seems to have a good bit of
support from the core devs.
On 9/10/07, Nis Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee skrev:
> > On 9/9/07, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Python unittest TestCase objects have a lot of helper functions like
> >> assert_(), failUnless(), assertEqual(), assertNotEqual() and so on[1].
> If
On 10 Zář, 02:32, "Joseph Kocherhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I think anyway that there should be some kind of caching by
> > default. It isn't only my problem - it may be quite usual to use
> > inlines with more rows and with foreign keys. (I will try to give
> > better description an
On 9/10/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valid point - however, in practice, the same context is passed to
> multiple templates. There are some edge cases (e.g., a view with two
> calls to render_to_template) where this isn't the case, but I wouldn't
> consider them to be the c
On 9/5/07, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apologies for taking so long to get back to you on this one, Gary -
I've been snowed under with other things.
> Gary Wilson wrote:
> > Russell then added the comments:
> > -
> > My hesitation here (and the reason I didn't include a 'c
On 9/10/07, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> One of the things I'm always stuck with when reading the docs is
> knowing where to import the described methods or objects from. For
> example, just now I'm working on Q objects and just read the
> documentation but don't know wh
On Tue 21 Aug 2007, Andreas Stuhlmüller wrote:
> Hey Django developers,
>
> this is the last status update for my Summer of Code project [1]
> before (or while) the final evaluation takes place. After a few words
> on last week's changes, I would like to summarize what is currently
> possible usin
Russell Keith-Magee skrev:
> On 9/9/07, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Python unittest TestCase objects have a lot of helper functions like
>> assert_(), failUnless(), assertEqual(), assertNotEqual() and so on[1]. If we
>> had a similar set of helper functions, possibly with more
Check out my new website about my efforts to make money on the
internet.
Let's make some money together.
Click http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=59398
make some extra money.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
16 matches
Mail list logo
