Re: On aggregates

2008-05-24 Thread Karen Tracey
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a hint to the community - one of the best suggestions we can have > at this stage of the project is a set of interesting problems to > solve. This would give us a set of concrete 'problems' that we can use > to

Re: On aggregates

2008-05-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of this looks pretty good. The 2 things I have to say are, a) I think the F() way of dealing with that, in place of list comprehension is the right way to go, there has been a lot of good work on that patch, and I think it works well, conceptually, with this. b) Is there any plan to make

Re: Multiple database support

2008-05-24 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Simon Willison wrote: > How about mysql_masterslave or mysql_replicated (I prefer the second)? Yes, mysql_replicated seems right. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group.

Re: On aggregates

2008-05-24 Thread Nicolas E. Lara G.
Hi Russell, I have been adding your test cases to the test suit and ran into troubles with some of them so I would like to know a bit more on what you were expecting from the queries: > * Does Author X have any friends? > (aggregate on a related object) >