TWID guys? I'd be happy to combine groups. I just don't know who
that is.
Jonathan
On Aug 20, 9:39 pm, "Eric Holscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the TWID guys are doing something as well. Might want to combine
> groups.
>
> Eric
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Jonathan Nelson
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> The best way to help out right now is to grab the "docs-refactor"
> branch from my git repo
Hereby convened, we mourn the untimely demise of the "toys" hg repo:
by many will it be sorely missed, time and again, bringing tears to
the cheeks of the afflicted.
But no! Don
Wouldn't it make sense to add a keyword argument to both itervalues
and iteritems, which lets you get lists instead? That would seem
easier than writing new methods. Example:
>>> dictionary.iteritems(as_list=True)
...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this messa
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Jonathan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> TWID guys? I'd be happy to combine groups. I just don't know who
> that is.
>
"This week in django" crew - http://www.thisweekindjango.com/ only the
premier podcast resource for django-aholics.
Get in touch with one
err, link doesn't seem to work with www for me, so try:
http://thisweekindjango.com/
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Mike Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Jonathan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> TWID guys? I'd be happy to combine groups. I just
It appears the trunk has a problem with the url pattern matching.
Using the urlpatterns below, the url
/admin/invoicing/invoice/1/20080821.pdf is parsed into
'1/20080821.pdf' instead of '1'.
urlpatterns = patterns('',
(r'^/?$', 'Billing2.invoic
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:05 -0700, Tim Keefer wrote:
> It appears the trunk has a problem with the url pattern matching.
> Using the urlpatterns below, the url
> /admin/invoicing/invoice/1/20080821.pdf is parsed into
> '1/20080821.pdf' instead of '1'.
That'
I'm not exactly sure what's going on here, and I managed to "fix" it
by switching my storage engine to myisam, but I figured I'd post
something here to see if any has had or is aware of this problem.
I had a blogs.author model that had a foreign key relation to User. I
created a User and then cr
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 07:23 -0700, Eric Montgomery wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what's going on here, and I managed to "fix" it
> by switching my storage engine to myisam, but I figured I'd post
> something here to see if any has had or is aware of this problem.
Please post support questions li
Tim Keefer wrote:
> It appears the trunk has a problem with the url pattern matching.
> Using the urlpatterns below, the url
> /admin/invoicing/invoice/1/20080821.pdf is parsed into
> '1/20080821.pdf' instead of '1'.
>
> urlpatterns = patterns('',
Hi all,
Just a quick question to set my head right for future Django
contributions. Why is "%s/" % var better than var + '/'? I can think
of some reasons: 1) consistency with other code, 2) certainty of
string concatenation. But is the second expression not much faster?
(This is an honest questio
Joost Cassee wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick question to set my head right for future Django
contributions. Why is "%s/" % var better than var + '/'? I can think
of some reasons: 1) consistency with other code, 2) certainty of
string concatenation. But is the second expression not much faster?
(This
Well, according to the python beginners book; "Dive Into Python" [1],
string formatting is less error prone as it also does type coercion
whereas string concatenation only works when all objects are already
strings. When it's possible that a user will be passing in parts of
the concatenation, I'd
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 18:00, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had thought that I read from that same source that formatting is
> faster than concatenation (and that's why I checked there before
> responding), but I don't see that mentioned. Not sure where I got that
> idea or if its
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had thought that I read from that same source that formatting is
> faster than concatenation (and that's why I checked there before
> responding), but I don't see that mentioned. Not sure where I got that
> idea or if
I am working on http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6148.
This includes a new option "db_schema" that's been added to a models
meta class.
It involves using a custom schema for any model that has this
attribute set.
The problem comes when testing.
In postgres a test database is created and inside
I noticed that in the get_or_create test case, Oracle fails because
the cx_Oracle database driver raises a DatabaseError, not a more
specific IntegrityError, when an INSERT lacks a required field.
(Malcolm anticipated this in his commit message for r8450.) Looking
at the C code for the driver, it
Also you are able to use %s for numbers and any custom types: "str%s"
% 12 but not "str" + 12.
Less errors -- more fun.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Jeff Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joost Cassee wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a quick question to set my head right for future Django
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if that's the case, isn't it possible to end the "processing" path
> with a redirect?
>
> i mean, when you finish the "processing", is it really necessary to
> serve the file?
> couldn't you just send back a http-redirect?
>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I had thought that I read from that same source that formatting is
>> faster than concatenation (and that's why I checked there before
>> respon
Hello,
I am writing to let you know that I have posted the latest patches on
aggregation support. All the planned features are implemented in the
patch for #3566.
For those not keping trac these are:
* Two queryset modifiers for doing aggregation: aggregate() and annotate().
* aggregate(
The reason I posted this here is that it seems like it might be a
problem with the way django generates the mysql.
>From what I understand, problems with foreign-key constraints with
innodb can occur if multiple-table updates are run "out of order," so
to speak. However, I'm definitely not an exp
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:39 AM, crippledcanary
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am working on http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6148.
> This includes a new option "db_schema" that's been added to a models
> meta class.
> It involves using a custom schema for any model that has this
> attribut
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Joost Cassee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quick question to set my head right for future Django
> contributions. Why is "%s/" % var better than var + '/'? I can think
> of some reasons: 1) consistency with other code, 2) certainty of
> string concatenation.
You can also map a dictionary of values to the format string:
>>> num = 99
>>> obj = 'red balloons'
>>> print '%(a)d %(b)s' % {'a': num, 'b': obj}
99 red baloons
Keith
On Aug 22, 12:28 am, "Ronny Haryanto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Joost Cassee <[EMAIL PROTE
Quite understandable. I'll drop it for the moment as I have what I
need to get my project going but as Arnold said- I'll be back..
2008/8/22, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:39 AM, crippledcanary
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am working on http://cod
26 matches
Mail list logo
