If the patch that's currently on there works with no changes at all,
I'd be hesitantly in favor of it, however if there any bugs, or other
complications associated with it, my answer is to use a real server,
setting up something like CherryPy locally is almost no effort, as
seen here:
Does it need to be multi-threaded? Can you get a multi-process dev
server instead/also?
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3357 should be given
> another look at enabling optional multi-threading on the dev server.
>
I think http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3357 should be given
another look at enabling optional multi-threading on the dev server.
Jacob previously closed this ticket, noting the patch could introduce
threading bugs, and would provide functionality too similar to that of
a production
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:42 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. When I rolled the release last night, I did 'python manage.py
> sdist' to generate the package, then uploaded it to the
> djangoproject.com server.
(and obviously I meant 'setup.py sdist')
--
"Bureaucrat Conrad,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:48 AM, leonel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive downloaded the tar.gz from
> http://www.djangoproject.com/download/1.0.1/tarball/
>
> and the md5sum does not match the md5sum from:
> http://media.djangoproject.com/pgp/Django-1.0.1-final.checksum.txt
OK, so here's what
Just wanted to update to say the bulk of this is now done (Steps 1, 2
and 3).
One note: the file structure is largely the same, but I did remove the
hidden import rules in each file that made it confusing as to which
styles were being included where. Each stylesheet is now explicitly
linked to
On Nov 15, 7:19 pm, Jannis Leidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this topic up for discussion.
>
> > jezdez says: "As Jacob said, that's such a pain. I tried and wasn't
> > able to implement even part of the wanted features. The app cache
> > needs a thourough look. But I
Would it be possible to have the doc search add a "-inurl:olddocs" to
all search queries? Anytime you search for something without it right
now, you always hit the redirect warning, even though there was no
redirect, and it was confusing a few users today in IRC, since they
thought they hit an
On Nov 15, 6:57 pm, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I personally was a 0 on this one. Let me explain why. I want Django to
> be a strong platform for developers, like myself, who really want the
> opportunity to have power in the framework, as well as features. As of
> lately I have
Thanks for bringing this topic up for discussion.
> jezdez says: "As Jacob said, that's such a pain. I tried and wasn't
> able to implement even part of the wanted features. The app cache
> needs a thourough look. But I don't see installing apps multiple times
> as a favored feature. I will
I personally was a 0 on this one. Let me explain why. I want Django to
be a strong platform for developers, like myself, who really want the
opportunity to have power in the framework, as well as features. As of
lately I have been using Rails for a project, and to be quite honest,
the maturity
I haven't looked at the patch yet, but I'd really like to be able to
change an app's name (and with it the names of the database tables),
which I thought was something that this proposal would include. So
fwiw, I personally would like to see it in 1.1.
Michael
Thanks, I will move to django-users for more details.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 16:23, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Ivan Mincik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have a problem when adding record by Django Admin and I am not sure where
> > I have to
As this is a usage question, please post it on django-users. This list is
for discussion of developing Django, not using it.
Karen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Ivan Mincik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a problem when adding record by Django Admin and I am not sure where
> I have to look for it. Is this some problem in Django Admin or it can be
> solved by some
> configuration in model ?
If you are unsure
Hi,
I have a problem when adding record by Django Admin and I am not sure where I
have to look for it. Is this some problem in Django Admin or it can be solved
by some
configuration in model ?
I use Foreign Key in table where I want to add record. Foreign Key is the
field containing some
It looks like the bug #3924 which should be allready closed.
--
Ivan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
I forget to write some details:
OS: Debian Etch with python 2.4
Django version: 1.0, also tested on new 1.0.1 with same results
--
Ivan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
Re. the recent post by Jacob Kaplan-Moss on Django 1.1 features and
votes:
ORM-23 gets a +1 from me. Jacob has given it a -0 and a comment "A
huge can of worms. Some really awesome benefits come out of this, but
so far everyone who's tried to make this work has failed. Until
there's an actual
Hi Russ,
I did at least the follwoing:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9604
regards
Valery
On Nov 8, 5:56 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:45 AM,Valery<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all, @mtredinnick, @jacob, @wilson, @ubernostrum
>
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo
