Re: test failures when CACHE_BACKEND is 'dummy:///'

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Tai Lee wrote: > Is this a bug? If not strictly a bug, would it be worth changing this > behaviour to allow developers to more easily run tests on their > applications as they develop? I told you in channel that it's normal - dummy does not cache anything - the t

Re: Additional Fields in Core

I've used and would like to see at least JSONField and/or PickleField in contrib/core. Here's a link to my current implementation. http://dpaste.com/hold/100270/ If it's not going to make it into contrib/core, I'd welcome any suggestions, improvements or alternative implementations. Cheers. Tai

test failures when CACHE_BACKEND is 'dummy:///'

Specifically, in `django.contrib.sessions.tests`: > ..F. > == > FAIL: Doctest: django.contrib.sessions.tests > -- > Traceback (most recent call last)

Re: Perl port of the django template system.

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Maluku wrote: > So how about the legal side of it? Do I have to include the source > code for Django in every distribution, since my work is derived from > your documentation or is just a link enough? A link is fine. Jacob --~--~-~--~~~-

Re: Perl port of the django template system.

Ok, there is no other module called anywhere like that and even wikipedia has entry for DTL that comes close. I have requested to rename the module to DTL or DTL::Template, will tell you what happens after I hear back. So how about the legal side of it? Do I have to include the source code for Dj

Re: Admin Site

Ok, I will do it. thanks On Dec 17, 8:31 pm, "Karen Tracey" wrote: > Please take follow-ups to this question to django-users.  This list is > really not for usage questions. > > Karen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: Admin Site

Please take follow-ups to this question to django-users. This list is really not for usage questions. Karen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send emai

Re: Admin Site

Something wrong with your code (maybe ib site.site_app.view) or third-party code that you use. Django has no entity with name `activeAccount`. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 20:26, samira wrote: > > I renamed my project, but no diffrent. it seems something is wrong in > admin templates. > > On Dec 17

Re: Admin Site

I renamed my project, but no diffrent. it seems something is wrong in admin templates. On Dec 17, 8:17 pm, "Jeremy Dunck" wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:14 AM, samira wrote: > > > I active admin site for Django 1.0.2, it is correct on my local, but I > > see below error on server: > > > em

Re: Admin Site

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:14 AM, samira wrote: > > I active admin site for Django 1.0.2, it is correct on my local, but I > see below error on server: > > emplateSyntaxError at /site/admin/ > > Caught an exception while rendering: Tried activateAccount in module > site.site_app.views. Error was:

Admin Site

I active admin site for Django 1.0.2, it is correct on my local, but I see below error on server: emplateSyntaxError at /site/admin/ Caught an exception while rendering: Tried activateAccount in module site.site_app.views. Error was: 'module' object has no attribute 'activateAccount' can anu bo

Re: Non-standard SQL generated in column definition for nullable columns in create table DDL

Hi Ian, I have opened a ticket for the same. Please follow the link for the same: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9862. Regards, Ambrish Bhargava --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django develope