On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 03:58 -0700, PyMan wrote:
> Hi all guys.
>
> I tried to look for around a way to set a datetime field with the
> CURRENT_TIMESTAMP value. I found nothing useful. Did I miss anything?
You missed that this list is for the development of Django itself, not
"how can I..." quest
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:57 -0700, faldridge wrote:
[...]
> Though a small change, this is definitely one that requires a design
> decision. I would greatly appreciate it if someone with authority
> would let me know whether I should open a ticket for this patch or
> not, and/or make any improvem
On 27 mar, 19:49, Justin Bronn wrote:
> Isn't the checking of `self.null` that you've identified as the
> problem already in the `GeometryField.clean` method? Are you
> proposing a recursive call?
>
> I agree that GeometryField is ripe to be improved -- but I'm unclear
> on exactly what is the p
I've got a patch for a slight behavior modification that I needed and
that might be useful for others, and I wanted to collect some thoughts
on it before I created a ticket.
Twice now, I've come across a situation where the default Django
behavior for inheriting permissions is inappropriate for m
On Mar 25, 12:20 pm, Fidel Ramos wrote:
> My proposed solution would be to call Field's clean() instead of
> checking self.null.
Isn't the checking of `self.null` that you've identified as the
problem already in the `GeometryField.clean` method? Are you
proposing a recursive call?
I agree th
Hi Malcolm,
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 00:23 +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What a blunder :( I submitted my proposal the way I will
> > have to submit to socghop.appspot.com with lines manuall
This is one of the short-comings with the auth system. We needed to use an
email address as username as well. Ugly process.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:38 AM, zellyn wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 7:54 pm, Edward Kaplan wrote:
> > The situation in which the feature would have been useful to me was
> > tha
On Mar 26, 7:54 pm, Edward Kaplan wrote:
> The situation in which the feature would have been useful to me was
> that I needed to synchronize the User model in my project with Google
> Apps. Rewriting the default auth views seemed like overkill, as I
> only wanted to override the set_password an
Hi all guys.
I tried to look for around a way to set a datetime field with the
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP value. I found nothing useful. Did I miss anything?
Imagine some processes running on parallel servers: what when one
process has to set a datetime field to "now" where "now" MUST BE set
using the db
