I wrote:
> Completely harmless side effect: you get
> double insertion of the CSRF token in the contrib apps (this works
> fine, it isn't even invalid HTML).
In fact, we can even remove this side effect, and the performance hit
of using the CsrfResponseMiddleware where it is not needed, by usin
Hi,
On Apr 8, 9:20 am, Petar Marić wrote:
> My name is Petar Marić, a long time Djangonaut with an idea how to
> improve a somewhat neglected part of Django - distributing static
> (media) files with reusable Django apps and problems with serving
> those media files.
>
> This is done by introduc
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:48 -0500, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
...
>> I'm aware of ticket #7539, but would prefer to keep the scope narrower
>> and ask the hopefully-useful question-- is #9308 a bug? If so, I'd
>> like to close it for 1.1.
>
Hi,
I once get BigInt working by a little "ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN" statement.
No code change for django was needed. But I have only done this once and this
application does not exist any more.
rah schrieb:
> I am Rahul.using Django0.96 from last 3 years. We are using
> BinInteger field in
I am Rahul.using Django0.96 from last 3 years. We are using
BinInteger field in one of our models. For BigInt we have added a
patch in Django. But now we want to migrate .96 to 1.0.2 .
The same problem is there in 1.0.2 it does not support to BigInt
field .The patch for 0.96 is not working with 1.
Let me start by saying I'm very sorry I didn't post my proposal on
django-devs earlier - attending a local conference and finishing my
master thesis sucked most of my awake time during the last 2 weeks.
This proposal is written in the reStructuredText format, but I created
a HTML version for conv
