Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

On Jun 18, 12:24 pm, Nick Phillips wrote: > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > >>> It's better to see it this way: Every page is an individual piece of > >>> content for itself, and still every page can have subpages. > > >>> A directory, on the other hand, can have subpages,

Re: Encodings outside of utf-8

On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:54 -0500, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM, ccahoon wrote: > ... > > > > Does anyone have a use-case they could share with me? > > > > I hear Malcolm's hovercraft is full of eels. For those wondering if Jeremy might have lost

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

Graham Dumpleton wrote: >>> It's better to see it this way: Every page is an individual piece of >>> content for itself, and still every page can have subpages. >>> >>> A directory, on the other hand, can have subpages, but is not that >>> interesting for itself. Which we don't want to

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

On Jun 18, 10:03 am, Waylan Limberg wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:19 PM, donquixote wrote: > > > On 17 Jun., 03:14, Graham Dumpleton > > wrote: > >> On Jun 17, 10:04 am, donquixote wrote:

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:19 PM, donquixote wrote: > > On 17 Jun., 03:14, Graham Dumpleton > wrote: >> On Jun 17, 10:04 am, donquixote wrote: >> >> > I would still be interested to read some arguments in favour of

Ticket 9360 get_fieldsets doesn't work as advertised

David Christensen raises a valid point in this ticket -- http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9360 Ubernostrum is right, as usual :-) get_fieldsets is definitely called for display; but not for save. So, what is the use case for this though? Why would you ever want to display an incomplete set

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

On 17 Jun., 03:14, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On Jun 17, 10:04 am, donquixote wrote: > > > I would still be interested to read some arguments in favour of the > > trailing slash. From a user perspective, it seems that without is > > better.

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

I think the multiple slashes are a quite theoretical problem. - The server might remove them anyway - People will know that this is a typo. The only reason why I talked about multiple slashes was for the sake of completeness: If we discuss a remove_slash solution, then why not clean up the

Re: Encodings outside of utf-8

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM, ccahoon wrote: ... > > Does anyone have a use-case they could share with me? > I hear Malcolm's hovercraft is full of eels. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Encodings outside of utf-8

If you take a look at my branch, you will see I have a feature in progress that takes both the Accept-Charset header (provided that the view passes along the request) and the Content-Type (which must be provided in the view) into account.

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

On Jun 16, 6:07 pm, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On Jun 16, 10:55 pm, Justin Myers wrote: > > Which hopefully will bring us back on topic: Regardless of our > > individual feelings on the trailing-slash holy war here, Patrick said > > it

[GSoC admin-ui] Add inlines complete

I've checked in support for adding an arbitrary number of inlines via Javascript for stacked inlines, and that feature will be in tabular and selector inlines shortly. There is a bug that I still need to fix with my implementation (default values aren't prefilled) but I'm working on that now.