Which textmate django bundle?

2009-12-22 Thread zweb
I see there are multiple django bundles for textmate. Which is the best one you recommend? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this gr

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

2009-12-22 Thread Michael Manfre
With multiple database defined, what is the expected behavior for syncdb and the other db related commands? The documentation shows that it is relatively easy to associate an admin form with a given database, but is there a way of associated a model or app to a given database? Regards, Michael Man

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

2009-12-22 Thread Craig Kimerer
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Brett Hoerner wrote: > On Dec 22, 4:27 pm, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: > > * Allow TEST_NAME=None to mean "don't try and instantiate this > > database in test mode" > > That sounds good, too. > If I was using the slaving part of multi-db i'd be very likely to w

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

2009-12-22 Thread Brett Hoerner
On Dec 22, 4:27 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >  * Allow TEST_NAME=None to mean "don't try and instantiate this > database in test mode" That sounds good, too. >  * Allow a top level TEST_DATABASES setting; TEST_DATABASES would > override DATABASES; if TEST_DATABASES isn't defined, then TEST_N

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

2009-12-22 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Brett Hoerner wrote: > On Dec 19, 6:48 am, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> You're right - read slaves are an intended common use case > > I know the branch landed but I'd like to mention another issue > regarding read-slaves, hope that's OK. :) > > Running tests a

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

2009-12-22 Thread Brett Hoerner
On Dec 19, 6:48 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > You're right - read slaves are an intended common use case I know the branch landed but I'd like to mention another issue regarding read-slaves, hope that's OK. :) Running tests against code that uses master and read-slaves (but actually point at

Re: Call for feedback: django.utils.signed and signed cookies

2009-12-22 Thread Johannes Dollinger
Am 22.12.2009 um 08:20 schrieb Simon Willison: > On Dec 22, 12:52 am, Johannes Dollinger > wrote: >> I'd like some more kwargs to Signer and TimestampSigner. Mostly >> what's >> inhttp://dpaste.com/136418/(except the `separator` kwarg, which was >> a bad idea as it depends on encode()): Signer

Add querystring helper methods to Page class

2009-12-22 Thread Ben Spaulding
A ticket has already been created for this, but SmileyChris recommended I bring the issue up here. Working with pagination and query strings within a template can be painful. Personally, I have never had a situation when I was paginating using a GET parameter where there were not other parameters

Re: Call for feedback: django.utils.signed and signed cookies

2009-12-22 Thread Simon Willison
Having talked to James about this I'm holding off on the commit until we've had it reviewed by real cryptographers. I'll aim to get it in before the 1.2 beta feature freeze. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To

Re: Congratulations Alex and Russell on committing multidb!

2009-12-22 Thread Simon Willison
... and congratulations to Marc Garcia and Jannis Leidel for the i18n/ l10n improvements that just went in as well. Also congratulations to everyone for the other awesome commits going in at the moment. There are far too many congratulations to spell them all out at the moment (with hindsight I wis

Re: Congratulations Alex and Russell on committing multidb!

2009-12-22 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Peter wrote: > > I just noticed and can only agree... nice work. > > //Peter > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 18:27, Simon Willison > wrote: >> >> And a big congratulations to all involved. Here's the changeset log >> (on GitHub since Trac seems not to like being linke

Re: Congratulations Alex and Russell on committing multidb!

2009-12-22 Thread Peter
I just noticed and can only agree... nice work. //Peter On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 18:27, Simon Willison wrote: > And a big congratulations to all involved. Here's the changeset log > (on GitHub since Trac seems not to like being linked to at the > moment): > > > http://github.com/django/django/com

Re: Bug #11017: Oracle LIKEC query doesn't use index

2009-12-22 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Jani Tiainen wrote: > Escaping bug exists in Oracle 9.2.0.5 and earlier. It was fixed in > patchset 9.2.0.6 and any later version. > > What comes to Oracle official support options for 9.2: > Premier Support Ends: 31-Jul-2007 > Extended Support Ends: 30-Jul-2010 >

Re: Oracle backend TextField unique=True error

2009-12-22 Thread Peter Herndon
On Dec 22, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Mario Briggs wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Ian Kelly wrote: >> Not currently, no. And if I were to put in some work on improving on >> the Oracle backend's support for filtering on TextFields, I would >> concentrate first on fixing the query so that it correctly compares >>

Ticket #8425 and USStateField (again)

2009-12-22 Thread James Bennett
I've previously brought up some issues with the removal of certain options from the choices on localflavor's USStateField[1] as a result of ticket #8425[2] and, with feature freeze for 1.2 approaching and perhaps more time soon to be available for such things, I'd like to call attention to it again

Congratulations Alex and Russell on committing multidb!

2009-12-22 Thread Simon Willison
And a big congratulations to all involved. Here's the changeset log (on GitHub since Trac seems not to like being linked to at the moment): http://github.com/django/django/commit/836d297e68d6a63103780295adebf6eaf6779611 And here's the documentation: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db

Re: Model translation

2009-12-22 Thread JK Laiho
As Russell said, this is probably a bad time, but I thought I'd throw in some quick notes nonetheless. > '''django-modeltranslation''': I think this general approach is the way to go I agree that it's probably the best alternative available currently, but still not without significant drawbacks (

Re: Call for feedback: django.utils.signed and signed cookies

2009-12-22 Thread Simon Willison
On Dec 22, 6:22 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > As far as the patch itself is concerned, looks good to me. My only > other request would be a serving of dogfood - if we're going to > include a signed cookie module, it would be nice to prove that it can > actually be used by actually using it. I'