Hi,
I had problems with taking part in any group at google for a long time. Google
always told
me, that there was a problem, sending mail to my account - although it was is a
GMail Account!
Often I send mail to the group and wondered, why I never got an answer...
The only solution I found, was
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Sergiy Kuzmenko wrote:
>> If you have any suggestions for how we could expose ungettext better
>> in templates, I'm all ears. However, given the complexity of
>> pluralization rules and pluralization usage in the general case, it's
>> not a simple task. Suggestions
> If you have any suggestions for how we could expose ungettext better
> in templates, I'm all ears. However, given the complexity of
> pluralization rules and pluralization usage in the general case, it's
> not a simple task. Suggestions welcome.
My suggestion is to make pluralization compatible
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Simon Meers wrote:
>> I was trying to figure out why I was getting Internal Server Errors
>> when attempting to upload a patch on code.djangoproject.com -- I have
>> discovered that there is "no space left on the device"!
>
> This seems to be fixed now (thank you w
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:31 PM, wrote:
> Regarding Russ' comment on pluralization:
>
>> Option 1: Spend a lifetime trying to make a single tag that can
>> accommodate every possible pluralization rule scheme
>>
>> Option 2: Provide a simple implementation that works for a lot of
>> cases, and
> I was trying to figure out why I was getting Internal Server Errors
> when attempting to upload a patch on code.djangoproject.com -- I have
> discovered that there is "no space left on the device"!
This seems to be fixed now (thank you webmaster). However it may be
worth noting that the email ad
I was trying to figure out why I was getting Internal Server Errors
when attempting to upload a patch on code.djangoproject.com -- I have
discovered that there is "no space left on the device"!
Now you can't even add a comment to the database:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/trac
Regarding Russ' comment on pluralization:
Option 1: Spend a lifetime trying to make a single tag that can
accommodate every possible pluralization rule scheme
Option 2: Provide a simple implementation that works for a lot of
cases, and encourage others to write specific template tags for thei
Hi
George, as far as I remember, ChoiceField has a line like:
self.choices = list(choices)
in __init__ method.
Until this is changed, there is no difference in passing a callable, a list, or
a generator.
So what do you suggest:
To simply allow passing a callable, or to allow truly dynamic c
oh wait, you're right.
(though choices=my_func seems to be neater then choices=(c for c in
my_func())
(for some reason i thought that choices=(c for c in my_func()) will
evaluate the my_func before we'll iterate through choices, but it
won't)
On Mar 24, 5:48 pm, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> George Kar
Hi there,
I've used a different approach to solve the problem.
If of interest, here is the snippet
http://gist.github.com/232372
for solving the the problem of a run-time ChoiceField.
The choices argument is a generator (or the usual list of tuples).
On 24 March 2010 06:48, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
