There is a file called "validation.py" which attempts to do validation
checking for the admin.
Though I realize it might be useful for the beginners (as a basic
sanity check) quite often I find it standing in my way and being
annoying.
The reasons are:
1) Python does not have interfaces. It relies
Steps to reproduce:
1) Specify a custom admin class (say A) which mentions a custom inline
with a custom template, say "a.html"
2) Write anything to "a.html" which will raise TemplateSyntaxError -
ie "{% extends "a.html" %}
3) Observe the change_form for A. Note that you do not see any errors,
but
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:24 AM, stefanw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess the most interesting point in this discussion is:
>
>> After a while that I spent time to develop new tags and filters
>> especially for
>> new projects, I began to think a way to implement a template engine
>> that
>> would let m
Yep, and encourage new people to the list to actively contribute!
One thing springs to mind, an agile / crystal process 'game', which
encourages all parties to contribute ideas within a time frame
(usually half an hour to a hour), without prejudice or discouragement.
This gets lots of good
Hello,
I guess the most interesting point in this discussion is:
> After a while that I spent time to develop new tags and filters
> especially for
> new projects, I began to think a way to implement a template engine
> that
> would let me no more write sort of "plugins" like tags and filters, a
On Aug 31, 10:20 am, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 10:52 +0700, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess Luke is right. I needed something and I implemented it because
I
couldn't find it done as I wanted by no others. A priority was Python
on linux
system (so no windows, .NET, ...) and t
Hi,
On Aug 31, 5:52 am, "burc...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Why you patched Django instead of making a connector so everyone would
> be able to use your template engine without patching django?
This is how the whole thing started. I started a new job and the one
that was
in charge of the projects befor
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 10:52 +0700, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> >From the engineering point of view, you did nothing important. In
> fact, I think, you did a bad thing to Django:
> By increasing the number of incompatible template engines for django,
> you fraction the user base of each one, so you
