Re: Enabling context access in simple_tag

2010-12-15 Thread Julien Phalip
On Dec 15, 10:52 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > On Dec 14, 7:34 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > >> On Dec 14, 12:02 am, Julien Phalip wrote: > > >> > On Dec 13, 10:16 am, Tai Lee wrote: > > >> > -snip- > > >> > > One suggestion from #1

Re: Python 3

2010-12-15 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:11:25 AM UTC+11, Łukasz Rekucki wrote: > > But there has been some significant progress in that matter, like the new > email package or PEP 444 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0444/). PEP and not PEP 444 is likely the more probable target for deployin

Re: formsets should be iterable: closed [WONTFIX] -- why

2010-12-15 Thread KentH
Any chance this one (#16455) can be reviewed before feature freeze? Thanks. Kent On Dec 3, 1:16 am, KentH wrote: > Ian's comments were spot-on. And it's extremely helpful when a > critique comes complete with a better solution. > > I've uploaded the improved code patch. Docs & tests unchanged. >

Re: Python 3

2010-12-15 Thread diogobaeder
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/faq/install/#can-i-use-django-with-python-3 On Dec 15, 5:45 am, sirex wrote: > On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: > > > but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon. > > Why? > > Maybe there should be two versions of Django,

RFC #12823

2010-12-15 Thread Philippe Raoult
I have produced a patch for this [1] long-standing SQL bug. The SQL produced with the patch is correct AFAIK, but my understanding of the sql code is rather poor so I'm hoping that someone who knows better will give it a look. There might be a more correct/elegant way to fix this. [1] http://code

Re: Python 3

2010-12-15 Thread Łukasz Rekucki
On 15 December 2010 17:48, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:45 AM, sirex wrote: >> On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee >> wrote: >>> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon. >> >> Why? > > Dependencies, for one. Apart from external ones, there are still

Re: Python 3

2010-12-15 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:45 AM, sirex wrote: > On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon. > > Why? Dependencies, for one. Psycopg2 and MySQLdb do not officially support Python 3 yet, so the only backends available out

Re: Python 3

2010-12-15 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:45 PM, sirex wrote: > On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon. > > Why? Please search the archives, and the FAQ, for the answer to this question. It's been answered *many* times. Yours, Russ M

Re: Python 3

2010-12-15 Thread sirex
On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon. Why? Maybe there should be two versions of Django, one that supports Python 3 and other that supports Python 2? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: Enabling context access in simple_tag

2010-12-15 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > On Dec 14, 7:34 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: >> On Dec 14, 12:02 am, Julien Phalip wrote: >> >> >> > On Dec 13, 10:16 am, Tai Lee wrote: >> >> > -snip- >> >> > > One suggestion from #1105 was to split out this functionality into >> > > ind

Re: Enabling context access in simple_tag

2010-12-15 Thread Julien Phalip
On Dec 14, 7:34 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > On Dec 14, 12:02 am, Julien Phalip wrote: > > > > On Dec 13, 10:16 am, Tai Lee wrote: > > > -snip- > > > > One suggestion from #1105 was to split out this functionality into > > > individual decorators, @takes_context, @takes_block. I'm not sure how