Re: contrib.sites and multitenancy

2011-01-16 Thread legutierr
I have been researching changes required to implement this, and I thought I would share one of the sticky points. Some of this is relevant to Gabriel's recent post. I have been reading through revisions 14141 [1] and 14142 [2], which reversed some of the changes in revision 13980 [3], and I have

Help Cure Boredom!

2011-01-16 Thread Jon Blackwell
We’re looking for an engineer to join our tech team (5 developers plus designer) and help turn our alpha into an awesome beta. Compensation will include a meaningful equity stake with salary to follow. About us: Located in San Francisco, Let’s Do This is an app that’s like a real time meetup.com w

Feature request - add raw_post to test client

2011-01-16 Thread Vincent
When looking through the test client I noticed that it requires a dictionary and always uses multipart/form-data posts. Sometimes it's helpful to use a raw post, instead. The flexibility allows you to just post a string, use key-value pair format, or anything you want, really. Using raw posts would

Re: contrib.sites and multitenancy

2011-01-16 Thread Gabriel Hurley
I would be more in favor of seeing a new setting to configure `get_current_site()` than seeing the existing `SITE_ID` setting shoehorned into a new purpose (and being permanently misnamed for legacy reasons). For the sake of allowing complete customization of the site lookup process I suppose a