Re: Tagging 1.4 django release in Subversion

2012-03-25 Thread Tai Lee
How come? The release that can be downloaded from the site already must correspond to an SVN revision number, right? Why not tag it as such so that people can easily get the same code from SVN as from the release tarball? Cheers. Tai. On Sunday, 25 March 2012 22:02:30 UTC+11, Florian Apolloner

Re: Add signals for QuerySet bulk operations such as `delete`, `update, `bulk_create`

2012-03-25 Thread Byron Ruth
Sure I guess you _could_ take a generic signals approach to handling all modify operations, but for each operation context is important. The state of the object(s) matters when performing operations. The `pre_save` and `post_save` signals for example have a `created` flag which allows for filte

RE: Add signals for QuerySet bulk operations such as `delete`, `update, `bulk_create`

2012-03-25 Thread Kääriäinen Anssi
A somewhat different proposal is in ticket #17824: Add generic pre/post_modify signal. I think the generic "object modified" signals would fit your use case very well. The idea is that there would be just one signal which would be fired for any data modifying ORM operation. The arguments for it:

Re: [GSoC 2012] Schema Alteration API proposal

2012-03-25 Thread Kushagra Sinha
Here is a revised proposal. Abstract -- A database migration helper has been one of the most long standing feature requests in Django. Though Django has an excellent database creation helper, when faced with schema design

Re: gsoc proposal, dynamic list form field

2012-03-25 Thread Yo-Yo Ma
On Mar 25, 2:41 am, Roy McElmurry IV wrote: > Okay, I have created a Google Doc of my proposal. I have greatly > elaborated on the idea. I have enabled commenting for anyone with the > link. Please take a look and let me know either in this forum or in > the Google Doc if there is anything I can a

Add signals for QuerySet bulk operations such as `delete`, `update, `bulk_create`

2012-03-25 Thread Byron Ruth
My use case is for regenerating aggregate data cache at a table level. Simply calling a single signal after a bulk operation is complete would enable invalidating such aggregate cache. There is not a very clean alternate solution to this problem unless using database triggers which calls an ext

Re: gsoc proposal, dynamic list form field

2012-03-25 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 25/03/2012, at 4:41 PM, Roy McElmurry IV wrote: > Okay, I have created a Google Doc of my proposal. I have greatly > elaborated on the idea. I have enabled commenting for anyone with the > link. Please take a look and let me know either in this forum or in > the Google Doc if there is anything

Re: Tagging 1.4 django release in Subversion

2012-03-25 Thread Florian Apolloner
Hi, it's not tagged yet on purpose. Cheers, Florian On Sunday, March 25, 2012 8:26:17 AM UTC+2, jdetaeye wrote: > > > Can a developer please tag the 1.4 release in the SVN repository please? > Ie create > http://code.​djangoproject.com/svn/django/​tags/releases/1.4

Re: gsoc proposal, dynamic list form field

2012-03-25 Thread Jonas H.
tl;dr: http://gsoc-demo.herokuapp.com/addrecipe (the "Ingredients" forms) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: gsoc proposal, dynamic list form field

2012-03-25 Thread Roy McElmurry IV
Okay, I have created a Google Doc of my proposal. I have greatly elaborated on the idea. I have enabled commenting for anyone with the link. Please take a look and let me know either in this forum or in the Google Doc if there is anything I can add or change to make this a more appealing proposal.