Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Erik Stein wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 21.05.2012 um 04:06 schrieb Adam Cezar Jenkins: >> >> > I'm sad to hear that about the pony. The pony itself isn't the issue, >> > the issue to me is that there is a l

Re: Customizable Serialization check-in

I do some changes to my previous API: (https://gist.github.com/2597306 <- change are included) * which fields of object are default serialized. It's depend on include_default_field but opposite to Tom Christie solution it's default value is True so all fields (eventually specified in Meta.mod

Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Erik Stein wrote: > > > Am 21.05.2012 um 04:06 schrieb Adam Cezar Jenkins: > > > I'm sad to hear that about the pony. The pony itself isn't the issue, > the issue to me is that there is a lack of branding of a real logo/mascot. > > > > I agree with 90% of the comp

Re: GSoC Check-in: Security Enhancements

Hi, Since my last check in I worked on improvements to contrib.sessions: - Introduction of signing framework - Session expiry checks (for Ticket [#18194][0] - And some other trivial patches. The tests (existing and the one which I added) are passing. These changes are in my [Pull Request #78

Customizable serialization now passing Django's test suite.

I've been working away on django-serializerslately, and I've now got a customizable serialization API that's backwards compatible with the existing serializers, and is passing Django's serializer tests. Exactly where I take this will depend on h

Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

Am 21.05.2012 um 04:06 schrieb Adam Cezar Jenkins: > I'm sad to hear that about the pony. The pony itself isn't the issue, the > issue to me is that there is a lack of branding of a real logo/mascot. > > I agree with 90% of the comparisons made in the blog post > http://grokcode.com/746/dear