Kudos for making this happen!
Small discrepancy: the blog post states python 2.7 is required; the
release notes it links to state python 2.6.5 is still supported, and 2.7
will be required from Django 1.7 onwards.
Yishai
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:08:33 +0300, James Bennett
wrote:
It's al
Looks like an awesome release coming up! Big thanks to the Django team :)
Looking forward to trying it out.
One comment about the fact that set_password() now (correctly) makes blank
passwords valid. I could imagine some users have assumed that
set_password('') was the same as set_unusable_pass
It's almost here!
Tonight we've issued a release candidate for Django 1.6. Information,
including links to downloads and release notes, is available on the Django
project blog:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2013/oct/22/16c1/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
If all it meant was that currently cached content would effectively be
expired, I wouldn't see this as being anything more than an strong note.
But as I'm sure people have created their own tools for building the page
cache keys to forcibly expire them [and not yet taken advantage of that
function
On 22 oct. 2013, at 19:05, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> I know that Florian is going to be there and there are rumors that Aymeric
> will, too.
Yes, I'm coming!
--
Aymeric.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from
Ticket #20346 is the request that cache keys should be generated from a
request's full URL rather than path, and the proposed implementation of
this is backwards-incompatible.
Because the existing keys are a hash of the path, and so, so far as I know,
we do not have the original path needed to mig
On 21.10.2013, at 15:57, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
> Hi Jannis,
>
> Let me know if you're in need of another committer at the sprint. Can't make
> any concrete promises as yet and I'd need to work out how cheaply I can get
> there, but I'd love to come assist if that's helpful.
Marc, absolutely, th
Sounds good. I guess that may be an addition here:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/instances/#validating-objects
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:40:46 AM UTC-4, Cal Leeming [Simplicity
Media Ltd] wrote:
>
> It seems there is a split reaction on whether or not models should assume
It seems there is a split reaction on whether or not models should assume
data is clean, and comes down to design decision.
I think that a docs patch explaining this entire concept to new users would
be sufficient for now (and I'm more than happy to spend time writing it).
Would any of the core d
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Hi Jasvir,
Hello Russell
> Frankly -- if something like this has happened, it's because Melange (the
I am really amazed that google uses such a software.
> We certainly haven't done anything strategically to avoid tagging the
> opportunity.
Tags
10 matches
Mail list logo
