On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:08 PM, schinckel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there was any reason why fields such as
> models.DateField() do not use the SubFieldBase metaclass
> trick to ensure they always contain instances of the correct
> class?
>
> I'm referring to the
Hi,
I was wondering if there was any reason why fields such as
models.DateField() do not use the SubFieldBase metaclass
trick to ensure they always contain instances of the correct
class?
I'm referring to the description
from
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Cody Scott wrote:
> I know that I can look at the 1.7 release notes to see what is to come in
> the next release.
>
> How do django developers decide what features to work on?
>
> Is there a minimum time between releases?
>
> Is there a
Hi Cody,
I suspect many of your questions may be answered in the documentation here:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/internals/release-process/
Here's some comments from my experience with using django since its initial
release, and recently making a concerted effort to submit code.
On
I know that I can look at the 1.7 release notes to see what is to come in
the next release.
How do django developers decide what features to work on?
Is there a minimum time between releases?
Is there a minimum quota for fixed bugs for a release?
Is there ever a poll to see which features the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
> Migrations landed after the feature freeze for the beta and are not quite
> feature complete yet. They will be part of 1.7.
>
Thank you Mark, this clarify it more.
--
Elyézer Rezende
http://elyezer.com
--
You
I have found the answer in the migrations docs [1], there says that will be
1.7.
Sorry
[1] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/migrations/
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Elyézer Rezende wrote:
> I think I have missed something or migrations will not be part of
Migrations landed after the feature freeze for the beta and are not quite
feature complete yet. They will be part of 1.7.
On 23 Oct 2013 13:57, "Elyézer Rezende" wrote:
> I think I have missed something or migrations will not be part of this
> release?
>
> I have not found
I think I have missed something or migrations will not be part of this
release?
I have not found it on release notes.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> 2013/10/23 Yishai Beeri
>
>> Small discrepancy:
2013/10/23 Yishai Beeri
> Small discrepancy: the blog post states python 2.7 is required; the
> release notes it links to state python 2.6.5 is still supported, and 2.7
> will be required from Django 1.7 onwards.
I've updated the blog post. Thank you.
--
Aymeric.
--
Kudos for making this happen!
Small discrepancy: the blog post states python 2.7 is required; the
release notes it links to state python 2.6.5 is still supported, and 2.7
will be required from Django 1.7 onwards.
Yishai
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:08:33 +0300, James Bennett
11 matches
Mail list logo