Re: Speedy Mail 2.0 - a new webmail platform in Python and Django

Guess I should sign up on django-users so I can throw my hat in for this... I've yearned for a Python-based webmail that has a featureful UI :) So far there's only Modoboa, excellent as it is. Competition is healthy, so... -- Curtis On 22 July 2015 at 05:20, Shai Berger

Re: Major features for 1.9

> Hopefully we can add Marten's URLs GSoC project to this list. > To me, this would be a killer feature of Django. Marten, if you see this, know that I'll help you out in testing as best I can - feel free to reach out! On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 10:19:38 AM UTC-7, Tim Graham wrote: > >

Re: Speedy Mail 2.0 - a new webmail platform in Python and Django

Hi Uri, On Tuesday 21 July 2015 21:05:03 Uri Even-Chen wrote: > To Django developers, > This list is for discussions about the development *of* Django. For issues of development *with* Django, please write to django-users. Thanks, Shai.

Re: Speedy Mail 2.0 - a new webmail platform in Python and Django

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Uri Even-Chen wrote: > > By the way, is there a simple way to convert PHP software to Python, or do we > have to rewrite in again line by line? if you do, you wouldn't gain anything. the advantage isn't in the language, it's in the

Speedy Mail 2.0 - a new webmail platform in Python and Django

To Django developers, I'm interested in creating a new webmail platform based on Python and Django, which will be free software & open source - Speedy Mail 2.0 (Speedy Mail 1.0 and 1.1 were based on a Perl software - Endymion MailMan web-mail, from 2000 to 2005). I want Speedy Mail 2.0's features

Re: Support for UNLOGGED tables in PostgreSQL

I just changed the URL in the to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/non-durability.html as suggested. Federico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: Support for UNLOGGED tables in PostgreSQL

The doc building process includes a linkchecker, if the link ceases to exist we will get notified (so the worst thing could be that the content changes to something completely different). On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:46:29 AM UTC+2, Christian Schmitt wrote: > > I mean I made the proposal, but