Re: Django Box - A vagrant virtual machine for testing Django

2016-08-28 Thread Josh Smeaton
An interesting idea put forward by Ed Morley on the issues tracker (https://github.com/django/django-box/issues/12) is to merge the django-box project into the django main repository directly. The meat of the suggestion is copied below: > The ideal end state I see is that this project lives in

Re: Django Box - A vagrant virtual machine for testing Django

2016-08-28 Thread Josh Smeaton
> > I have my environment set up already, and I suspect this would hold for a > lot > of the more experienced developers here; do you think the new box will > improve > things for me? > > It probably won't make a big difference for those that already have environments setup for django develo

Re: Sonar for the Django rpoject

2016-08-28 Thread Ivan Sevastoyanov
OK, I will try to do that on my machine and will post the results here (because frankly speaking I haven't done it before on my own). I don't know when I will have enough time to do it but I guess 3 to 4 days. Regards, Ivan On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 11:16:57 PM UTC+3, Aymeric Augustin wrote

Re: Sonar for the Django rpoject

2016-08-28 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 28 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Ivan Sevastoyanov wrote: > My question is do you consider using SonarQube for code quality analysis, > static analysis and find bugs because it's able to do that. I guess that depends on the signal / noise ratio in the things SonarQube flags. Perhaps you could do an

Re: Sonar for the Django rpoject

2016-08-28 Thread Ivan Sevastoyanov
My mistake. I had to ask with more details. My question is do you consider using SonarQube for code quality analysis, static analysis and find bugs because it's able to do that. I am asking for the Django project as a whole. Sonar can track the commits and show you if there are added some "code

Re: Sonar for the Django rpoject

2016-08-28 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 28 Aug 2016, at 20:46, Ivan Sevastoyanov wrote: > Do you consider using SonarQube (or something similar) for code quality > analysis? Hello Ivan, Generally speaking, there isn’t a lot of demand for code changes with no impact on functionality, especially as first time contributions. Such

Sonar for the Django rpoject

2016-08-28 Thread Ivan Sevastoyanov
Hi guys, I am new to Django and I want to contribute to the project soon. Sorry for the question if it's not appropriate. Do you consider using SonarQube (or something similar) for code quality analysis? Regards, Ivan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: Django Box - A vagrant virtual machine for testing Django

2016-08-28 Thread Shai Berger
Hi Josh, This looks very promising. Thanks for making it. On Sunday 28 August 2016 08:55:05 Josh Smeaton wrote: > > *1. Should we host the django-box project under the django organisation?* > > [...] Should this project be proposed for inclusion within the django > organisation under DEP7 > htt

Re: Using auth stuff without installing the auth app

2016-08-28 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 23 Mar 2016, at 01:57, Matt wrote: > I like to use the authentication machinery in Django, without explicitly > putting 'django.contrib.auth' in INSTALLED_APPS. This prevents a bunch of > unused tables from being creating in the database. Hello, For the record, we came to the following r