On 18-09-15 23:15:10, Adam Johnson wrote:
>> I agree bulk_save() maybe is not the best name as people might expect
>> signals to be sent, but are there any suggestions other than bulk_update()?
>> Maybe something more accurate, like bulk_update_fields()? Or
>> bulk_save_fields()?
>
>bulk_update_fie
>
> I would require some kind of configuration to define which response
> content-type should be encoded by which algorithm.
I think there's room there to support custom tactics, for example content
length may also be useful to determine which algorithms are applicable, or
perhaps compression cou
Thank you all for the feedback, I’ve changed the method to be bulk_update()
as this seems to be the most liked option. Naming things is hard, and while
bulk_update() isn’t perfect I think it’s a bit better than
bulk_update_fields() or just update_fields().
On 16 September 2018 at 10:19:40, Tobi
