Hey Adam/Simon,
How can we take this forward ?
Regards,
Aditya N
On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 3:04:14 PM UTC+5:30 N Aditya wrote:
> Hey Adam,
>
> Also, after giving it a bit of thought, I figured that integrating this
> logic with the routers framework isn't entirely necessary.
> So I came u
Aditya,
> "atomic does already call DB routers" -> Firstly after reading code, I
don't think the transaction APIs consult the routers. Secondly, I think I
already answered it in the initial discussion.
Atomic doesn't consult it directly but the ORM does before interacting with
transactions. Wh
I'm also -1 on changing anything in Django right now.
I think we should indeed take the "default position" for complex features:
write a third party library, get some traction. If many people find it
useful, we can look at adding something to core. It sounds like you're
already working on such a l
Week ending May 30, 2021
*Triaged: *
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32774 - cache_page decorator
doesn't work for cross-browser (needsinfo)
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32778 - Avoided unnecessary
recompilation of token regex in _sanitize_token(). (accepted)
https://co
On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 12:13:58 PM UTC+2 Adam Johnson wrote:
> I'm also -1 on changing anything in Django right now.
>
-1 as well, I simply see no way how something like:
```
with transaction.atomic():
Model1.objects.create()
Model2.objects.create()
```
will allow for any useful
