Details are available on the Django project weblog:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/sep/01/bugfix-release/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
As the won't fixer person 11 years ago, I'm also more in favour of the
change now, even if it changes a bit the meaning of POT-Creation-Date from
"last time the pot file was updated" to "last time a change was detected in
the pot file".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
Hi all,
I'm also in favour of the change, I also find the current behaviour annoying.
Paolo
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 1:10 PM אורי wrote:
>
> I also find it annoying that one line changes always even if there are no
> changes in translations. I prefer the file not to change at all if nothi
I also find it annoying that one line changes always even if there are no
changes in translations. I prefer the file not to change at all if nothing
has changed.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:03 AM 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers
(Contributions to Django itself) wrote:
>
I'm in favour of the change. Leaving the file as-is when no actual data
changed just makes sense to me.
The original discussion didn't touch upon the --update flag, so maybe it
didn't exist then, or the participants didn't know about it. Its existence
really weakens the argument that “we shouldn't
