Hello,
Im interested in participate too, but I don't have much experience. Can you
tell me more about what do you want to do please?
Thank you
El dom., 23 feb. 2020 6:46 a. m., keshav kumar
escribió:
> Hello,
> I want to participate in GSoC with Django. And I want to work on 'Improve
> Admin Fi
c (and sometimes surprising) queries.
3. Anyone have tips on implementing this as a library external to Django
with lots of monkey patching?
I'd be happy to take a swing at it if there was a >50% chance that it would
be at least considered.
-bryan, cto & cofounder @ zapier
--
You
usiastic about submitting proposals and
bugs.
I think three is enough for now. We've gotten this far through the
thread with a lot of heads nodding, so let's start thinking about how
to take action.
Cheers,
Bryan
On Feb 6, 11:52 am, Eric Holscher wrote:
> I went ahead and repl
Also +1 to the idea of a conference site. I'm +0 on the prospect of
adding features like the ones on the Carsonified site for brevity's
sake. Definitely +1 to the prospect of seeing examples of unit testing
and caching. On a tangent, if there's any design work needed for said
site, I'll be happy t
On Aug 8, 9:51 am, Dave Jeffery wrote:
> Just a quick note that I would be happy to help out with this area of the
> docs too.
Same here. Should we create a wiki page to coordinate this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
+1 on trac milestones. I think it's important that people start to see
what will be done when and what features will get pushed off to 1.0.
Milestones, at least for me as a growing developer, have always
provided that extra motivation as the progress meter approaches 100%.
Just seems more organize
Indeed! Congrats! Now we need to get brosner to throw this into NFA so
us branchies can start playing with it as well. :)
On Apr 26, 11:30 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Massive congratulations and thanks all around, and to Malcolm!
>
> On Apr 27, 1:04 am, "Mike Scott" <[EMA
I'm more looking for discussion. Feedback on what I've said and on
the implementation if people are so inclined. I'm not done yet by
far, so making an official patch submission would be premature.
On Jan 28, 2:39 pm, "Tom Tobin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/28/08, Kaelten <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> What am I forgetting?
This is a completely personal and probably selfish desire, but I'd
love to see the comments system rewrite in there. It's been on that
informal wiki-list ever since I started using Django.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
>
> On the issue of what to call 1.0, I like Max Battcher's idea of
> adopting an Ubuntu-like date-based version. Puts some useful
> information (how old is it?) into the release name and avoids
> preconceived notions of stability/completeness associated with .0
> releases.
I'm +1 on that as
probably my headache is limiting my ability to rationally
articulate. :)
On Jul 12, 11:24 am, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/12/07, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > trying to do a .set with bytestrings that contain non ascii char
> &
I ran into a similar issue when accessing the memcached python api.
When running django unicode the value returned from the database was
valid. However when running the non unicode version of django it'd
blow up in my face.
trying to do a .set with bytestrings that contain non ascii char
value
john-f wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm currently moving sites over to one server at my company. The
> server will be hosting 2 versions of django (0.91 and 0.95).
>
> Currently all the 0.91 sites on the server are up and running.
> However, after I set up my first 0.95 site on the server I'm getting a
> "
I have experience working remotely. I'm in southern USA.
Are you looking for fulltime or contract?
--B
sime wrote:
>I'm looking for a talented local programmer to help with a growing
>workload, on a regular contract basis. All projects in django :-)
>
>Or if you have experience working remotely
"and i hope he has mentioned our #django IRC channel - with a
reputation for never RTFM'ing anyone ;-)"
Bahahaha. And so true.
On Oct 18, 7:23 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19-Oct-06, at 7:29 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> > should probably add mailing lists as a line
>This is exactly the sort of change I was thinking of (note that it took
>exactly two lines :-) ). Not sure if it covers all cases at the moment,
>but you're definitely on the right track.
>
>
heh yeah, I did notice it was two lines. And it probably does not handle
all the cases since I'm self
forwarding to dev list from -users, since it fits dev better
the original thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/fdc940db9fd9d7a0/4a966c68c0036854?lnk=raot
--B
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subsc
that this functionality needs to be Django
proper. It would be nice, but you don't *need* this to make a Django
project work. But if you do want to access settings. Seriously. Make
your own library. Stick your custom template context processor in it.
And import your library in all your projects. Simple
nality.
Ultimately, we'd like to submit this as a patch to Django's FileField,
but would like to get some feedback from the community before we move
further. Comments please :)
Bryan
[1] http://www.verdjn.com/wiki/FileField
[2] http
public access.
Cheers,
Bryan
On 8/5/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. That answers one concern. But that's a very blunt tool. You can't
> for example, allow some users (say content providers) to upload
> multiple megabytes, but limit others (content
You can use Apache's LimitRequestBody directive to restrict the size
of accepted uploads.
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/ca95963aaa33ce1e
On 8/5/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way Django ships, isn't it possible for a user to hijack the
> se
I noticed that this ticket has just been closed. Just wanted to say
Thanks to the Django dev team for finally accepting our patch!
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1650
Cheers,
Bryan :)
Bryan Chow wrote:
> Just wanted to bring attention back to this issue. A few months ago,
> Ian Cl
+1
This is great, Malcom, and a step forward to my comments/goals/rants in
the other thread.
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> 2) A decorator:
>
> @models.Abstract
> class Thing(models.Model):
>...
>
When did python support class decorators?
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> ... I like seeing that a m
The only framework that I've seen sufficiently tackle this whole user
extension problem is asp.net 2.0 with their provider model. The
provider model allows users to extend or "plug" in their own
implementation of a feature. This is useful when the given schema
doesn't meet your needs, such as a
It would also be nice to get a status report on all of the "Heads
up"/SoC django projects. I'm particularly interested in the status of
Model Inheritance, Row Level Permissions, and Schema Evolution.
With "status" being the current state of the project and its pro
and Python and it may take me
quite some time.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Bryan Kyle
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email
Just wanted to bring attention back to this issue. A few months ago,
Ian Clelland and I submitted a ticket to allow templates to be extended
programatically, i.e. not necessarily on the filesystem. I love the
Django templating system but it seems strange that this capability is
not already in Djan
> 1) a commandline util only (via manage.py)
+1
James Bennett wrote:
> On 5/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) a commandline util only (via manage.py)
>
> This would maintain consistency with the rest of Django's management
> options; I'd always figured that at lea
Ok, this is my last comment on the topic.
Now that you've mentioned it, first_name and last_name should not even
be in User. They should be in profile. Profile is for
personalization, not for user specific login criteria like (is_active,
is_staff, is_superuser, IS_APPROVED).
I'm certain this i
My point is how do you lock the user out until he confirms his changed
email address?
Luke Plant wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 19:58, Bryan wrote:
>
> > I need their email to be verified at sign up and when they change it
> > in their profile. I don't understand how th
I need their email to be verified at sign up and when they change it in
their profile. I don't understand how this system would verifiy
someone changing their email address.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
ASP.NET's built in Membership system, which was I'm sure was thoroughly
thought out, has an IsAppproved field in addition to their IsLockedOut
(is_active) field.
>From a few of the emails I received, I'm not sure you all are seeing
the difference between is_active and is_approved. An email
verif
Ok, i made a ticket for this (i thought that was probably a better
place for this): http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2033
Bryan wrote:
> I strongly feel the need for an is_approved field in the User model
> (django.contrib.auth.models). This field would allow for user systems
I strongly feel the need for an is_approved field in the User model
(django.contrib.auth.models). This field would allow for user systems
that require email verification, user systems that require
subscriptions/payment, etc...
Checking for is_approved at login, should be an option. Some possibl
Thanks, Adrian. I took care of the errors you get when you try to
python manage.py syncdb:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1904
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 5/16/06, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I talked with fog, one of the psycopg2 developers, about the curre
can
change later on that would affect django if it decided to support it
right now.
On another note, it would be nice to see
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1736 in the trunk.
Bryan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Thanks a lot, James. This is really great. Will this be merged into
the trunk any time soon?
Bryan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, sen
o reinvent anything.
p.s. sorry if this is a duplicate post, but google is requesting that I
resubmit. (i've never used this system before).
Bryan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django d
Caches cleared, same problem in Firefox on both Debian Linux and
Windows.
I just realized that both the calendar and clock widgets were within a
fieldset with 'classes': 'collapse'
I removed the classes and the problem went away.
Note that it works fine in the non-Dojo admin with 'classes':
'co
Firefox 1.5
Tested on Debian Sarge (Firefox from backports.org) and Windows XP.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@goog
t the calendar and clock widgets do not
render properly on Firefox -- they're positioned above the top of the
page instead of beside the field.
Cheers,
Bryan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Dj
41 matches
Mail list logo
