hatever), would that pull request be
something you would have interest in merging? Or do you consider the
existing sitemaps are good enough, and you don't want to have support
something new (for example, rewriting all the docs)?
Thanks,
— Carl Johnson
--
You received this message because y
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 6:35:06 PM UTC-5, Shai Berger wrote:
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 18:17:36 Carl Johnson wrote:
> > I was adding a sitemap to a project, and I more or less had to rewrite
> the
> > views from scratch because s
I would find that useful. In my experience, I often have a mixture of CBV
and non-CBV code, and it's annoying to shoehorn decorators into the as_view
method. It would be much more convenient to just add to
self.view_decorators.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
FWIW, this also bit me. I have a deploy script that runs python -m
compileall as part of its build process. It was pretty easy to work around
by adding -x app_template, but why make everyone else work around Django?
ISTM it would be better to call the files .py_template instead since they
aren'
I think the template files should be shipped out as .py-tpl, since that's
their type (a Python template), and the resulting final files should just
have the extension renamed. Having two extension is just confusing and
leads to questions like this one about other kinds of templates.
--
You rec