Re: Good IDE setup to use for large Django projects suggestions

The Code Janitor wrote: > Although it is a lot smarter about python development I am wondering > if there is a better alternative. > This list is for discussion of the development *of* django, not with it (or python in general, for that matter). The django-users group is a much better forum

Re: Rethinking silent failures in templates

Graham King wrote: > And if Django had logging, we could have a SQL log, and I wouldn't > have to start all my projects by setting up a logger, a SQL logging > middleware, and an audit log of object create/update/delete. I trust you've seen the django-logging project on c.g.c? http://code.googl

Re: Django port on OpenVMS - Oracle/Rdb backend

Collin Grady wrote: > Steve Holden said the following: > >> If you want considered opinions you would do well to wait longer than 51 >> minutes! >> > > You should check the date as well as the time; he sent the first email > *two days* before the second. > Steve, perhaps next year at

Re: Queryset-refactor branch has been merged into trunk

Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > I merged queryset-refactor into trunk just now. This was changeset > r7477. Thanks for all of your effort on this, Malcolm. Malcolm's Amazon Wishlist: http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/registry.html?ie=UTF8&type=wishlist&id=1VB5A16R2KV0T

Re: Getting Images to display in Development Environment

No, I meant #python, because you're almost always in #django.  :-P Good catch. Don Spaulding Collin Grady wrote: Don Spaulding said the following: into the irc channel (#python on irc.freenode.net) to get the help I think you mean #django on irc.freenode.net :)

Re: Missing patch files on code.djangoproject.com

Jacob, if you didn't like my patch to #231, you could've just said so, you didn't have to delete patches from others to cover your trail.  :-)  Uploading now... Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: On 9/18/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I could reupload that one, but there are

Getting users to read the right docs (was Re: Time for a new release?)

I'm also a lurker on the dev list, so excuse the interruption.  James Bennett wrote: Thus, the problem to solve here is simple: how do we ensure that someone who downloads the 0.96 release uses the 0.96 version of the documentation? Bundling HTML versions of the docs isn't a solution,