Seth,
This sounds like a great idea. I believe the folks behind ccbv.co.uk are
also trying to do something like this, maybe you could collaborate with
them?
George
On Monday, August 19, 2013 8:40:36 PM UTC+1, Seth Moon wrote:
>
> Such as one for each of the pink CBVs (CreateView, UpdateView,
everyone
> is raving about!
>
>
> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 1:09:40 AM UTC+11, Daniel Sokolowski wrote:
>
>> I like this approach.
>>
>> *From:* George Hickman
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 15, 2012 7:27 AM
>> *To:* django-d...@**googlegroups.co
ski
> <daniel.s...@klinsight.com > wrote:
> > I like this approach.
> >
> > From: George Hickman
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 7:27 AM
> > To: django-d...@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: Re: Class based views: A standard hook for
> http-me
I have a slightly different proposal, one where we can avoid the extra hook
but hopefully cover everyone's use cases too.
https://github.com/ghickman/django/commit/85ac39a481074c25af1ed72a7a12e62ff5425e54
I've personally never liked the setting of args, kwargs & request from
within dispatch
I think the naming in rest framework is certainly nicer than init, purely
from the being explicit point of view. Having a method with the same name
as a dunder method seems like it would be a point of confusion for new
comers too.
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 7:43:45 AM UTC, Mike Fogel wrote:
