On 08/20/2014 04:28 PM, Ivan Kharlamov wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 03:52 PM, Ivan Kharlamov wrote:
>> On 08/20/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
>>> I'd say ArrayField is a straight up data field at the moment. It stores
>>> 0-1 lists of data. It's no di
On 08/20/2014 03:52 PM, Ivan Kharlamov wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
>> I'd say ArrayField is a straight up data field at the moment. It stores
>> 0-1 lists of data. It's no different to CommaSeparatedIntegerField
>> (seriously, why does that ex
On 08/20/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
> I'd say ArrayField is a straight up data field at the moment. It stores
> 0-1 lists of data. It's no different to CommaSeparatedIntegerField
> (seriously, why does that exists...)
>
> *If* PG gets the relevant update that will allow `integer[] reference
On 08/18/2014 02:03 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> As for changing ForeignKey to virtual field plus concrete field
> representation - I just realized this will be backwards incompatible no
> matter what we do regarding categorization. An all-fields including
> get_fields() call will return separate
On 06/26/2014 06:00 PM, e.generalov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In my AngularJs application I want to reuse some django admin forms (to
> "add", "edit" and "delete" orders)
> but show them in the iframe instead of popup windows.
>
> In order to display "add" form in iframe I create a template:
>
>
On 11/04/2013 04:24 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Emanuele Bertoldi
> mailto:emanuele.berto...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I've opened a ticket (#21370) with a proposal for the *inclusion of
> a generic "getter" filter* in the built-in library.
>
> *Wh
Hi!
On 10/15/2013 04:56 PM, rok wrote:
> I have recently been testing the 1.6b4 tag with a new app we are
> writing, using apache and wsgi. However, I could not get rid of the
> following issue happening on every request:
>
> ...
> [Tue Oct 15 12:50:36 2013] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
> "/
Hi, Carl,
On 09/27/2013 09:01 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> On 09/27/2013 03:07 AM, Ivan Kharlamov wrote:
>> Maybe I'm a careless kind of guy, but when I test out new versions of
>> Django, reading all of the release notes is rarely the first thing that
>
Hi!
Maybe I'm a careless kind of guy, but when I test out new versions of
Django, reading all of the release notes is rarely the first thing that
I do... my bad. :) My first action is usually firing up the test suites
and looking at the number of failed tests and deprecation warnings.
As we all k
On 02/24/2012 01:29 PM, Chris Northwood wrote:
> A +1 from me too, I've really felt the pain on this when doing i18n
> templates, I understand the aesthetics, but the aesthetics of
> obscenely long tags is also bad imo...
>
> On 24 February 2012 09:23, Shawn Milochik wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 201
On 01/29/2012 09:39 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> On 01/29/2012 12:31 PM, Ivan Kharlamov wrote:
>> On 01/29/2012 09:16 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> For other options checkout this
>>>>> guide:http://stackoverflow.com/a/7934
On 01/29/2012 09:16 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>
>>> For other options checkout this
>>> guide:http://stackoverflow.com/a/7934577/497056
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ivan Kharlamov
>
> Probably a really mediocre reference assuming its o
t;
> The model that requires custom fields is for example Person. They
> might want a custom field to store address, blood type, or any other
> thing.
>
> MANY THANKS in advance! Have a nice sunday!
> Bernardo Pires
>
Bernardo, Hello.
For other options checkout this guid
return getattr(value, arg)()
else:
return getattr(value, arg)
else:
try:
return value[arg]
except KeyError:
return settings.TEMPLATE_STRING_IF_INVALID
Here's the corresponding ticket: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1603
14 matches
Mail list logo
