have been wonderful to fill
the gap that I had. It would have saved me quite a bit of *re-learning* things,
which is always annoying.
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
pgpgBniHjlLJD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
imagine is written in views that
go with a specific app. A standard implementation of ACL in contrib one
would allow for more pluggable pluggable apps.
Let me know what you think!
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
phillc wrote:
> different domains = different settings.py = different urls.py
>
Not necessarily. An apache vhost can have a singe instance of a Django
site, and multiple ServerAlias entries could mean that several different
DNS names are used to access the same instance of Django.
to
create a site like this with the current lorem ipsum tag. Am I missing
something?
Confused,
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ettings.py.
Is this too cumbersome for test runners? I really don't know how to make
it easier.
How do I handle the case where someone tries to run the test, but they
have supplied bad LDAP settings, or haven't added any data to ldap?
Thanks for any insight!
Jeff Anderson
http://code.djangoproject.
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Jeff Anderson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> #2507 has been accepted, documented, and there is a working patch. It's
>> been used in production for some time.
>
where else.
It was originally written by a co-worker of mine, and we'd be more than
happy to tackle #2. I figured I'd run it by the dev list before I go and
close the ticket on my own initiative. (It is marked as "accepted" after
all.)
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
#2507: http://code.djangopro
be updated after 1.0 was released. I'd be willing to help out
with updating the book-- are there plans to make the source code
available so the community could contribute?
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 00:15, Jeff Anderson wrote.
>
> Honestly, not that my opinion matters in any way, but:
> Don't fix it if it ain't broken.
>
Improving on something doesn't always fall under this saying. While it
gives good advice in many cases, you
e it in at
some point.
Hopefully this is helpful and reflects the thinking behind the inclusion
of this feature.
Let me know if you end up using the one from #2507!
Jeff Anderson
[0] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2507
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
amused by your reaction.
You are right though, this community does seem to come through with a
tone more mature than your average mailing list. :)
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 16:15 -0600, Jeff Anderson wrote:
>
>> Jacob's git repo is great. Trac has at least a couple plugins that can
>> handle git repos.
>>
>> There are enough people who are willing to contribute to the developm
discussion. I forbid holy
wars and flaming.
Has making a move to a distributed model already been discussed for
Django? The closest I've seen is Jacob announcing his git repo, and
that's about it. I haven't seen any serious discussion among core devs
about the idea.
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
ting ever performs better in certain
situations, but for the very simple test case I used, string formatting
appears to be slower.
Hopefully this answers your question!
Jeff Anderson
concattest.py:
s1 = "Hello"
i=0
while i<999000:
greeting="English: " + s1
i=i+1
concattes
Hello,
I'm curious about the status of the documentation refactor.
I see that it is on the 'maybe' list, and that the hg repo hasn't been
touched in a couple months.
What's the best way to get up to speed and help get this ready for checkin?
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
ows server that
could handle an instance, but I'm sure someone does.
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
for running one here.
If this would be useful to the developers, I'll go ahead and proceed. If
not, I won't.
Let me know!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello I've run into a bug[0] with that affects a new app that is 'out
there' and is experimental. I have to apply this patch to get the app to
work. There doesn't seem to be anything controversial about the patch.
I've updated the patch to apply cleanly against the current SVN. Is
there
These are tickets that don't have an owner, are DDN, and are in the 1.0
alpha milestone.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6406 - discusses hooks for form saving
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7268 - The only thing left here is
changing script names in django to a consistent naming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That one looks like it should have been #4148:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4148
On Jun 25, 1:25 am, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Anderson said the following:
#4118
Do you have the wrong # here? That ticket is
against current trunk. I'm a +/- 0.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4118
That's all for tonight.
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jeff Anderson wrote:
This ticket was marked as Design Decision Needed because the patch was
old. I've updated the patch to work with the current SVN. Is there
anything else holding it back from being checked in?
Jeff Anderson
::bump::
This ticket is about 3% of the first milestone
Unfortunately, this wasn't my idea.
I just triaged it three months after anonymous came up with said patch.
http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/7735/1214331065
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This ticket was marked as Design Decision Needed because the patch was
old. I've updated the patch to work with the current SVN. Is there
anything else holding it back from being checked in?
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
mails like this one. It
really doesn't take me that long to do, and if it is helpful, I'm happy
to do it.
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tickets "Boogs" that should be
squished for 1.0, or are they just trivial annoyances?
Hopefully my question makes sense (it is a Monday after all)
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
ps:
Some examples:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7179
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7361
http://c
ast amount of errors is likely the right candidate.
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t's in harmony with one of the major philosophies of
open source... freedom. :)
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
am doing
what I can to push along 1.0, although I'm still getting up to speed on
the development process. :)
Cheers!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I went to subscribe to django-updates so I can do what I can with
furthering django, but it seems that whatever script posts to the list
hasn't been working since March. Is this accurate? Has the
django-updates information moved to another medium?
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
had the ticket loaded
in my browser since last night.
Since you say yank the old code, it looks like the only thing left is to
make an up-to-date unified patch, and commit.
I'll hop onto IRC and see if brosner is there.
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
browser!) and attempting to post a ticket.
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
), etc...
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to live somewhere else, or is it happy
there?
*The ticket is marked as patch needing improvement, but unless I'm
missing something, I believe it had all the modifications made to it
that were requested. What else did it need?
Thank you!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
e say that both places used the same
accounts, so I knew that would be the case.
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thank You!
I have successfully opened a ticket.
Jeff Anderson
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 11:36 PM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have a patch to submit, but my ticket is rejected as possible spam.
>> What does your spam detector look fo
I have a patch to submit, but my ticket is rejected as possible spam.
What does your spam detector look for?
What does one need to do to get an account? I am guessing that it is
easier to open tickets if I have an account?
Thanks!
Jeff Anderson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
37 matches
Mail list logo