Re: Admin question: how to show uneditable fields

2009-06-18 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
no one at this group. this group is intended to discuss about django development of django framework itself by the core developers. try django-users group instead which is intended to discuss usage related issues. On Jun 18, 2009, at 5:44 PM, EBunders wrote: > > Hello > > I am new to djan

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

2009-06-16 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
Thanks for pointing me to the bikeshed. It is an excellent topic that I wasn't aware of. Anyway, I'm still not understanding how this topic relates to my reply. On Jun 17, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:02 AM, M. N. Islam

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

2009-06-16 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
??? On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Hanne Moa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 22:08, M. N. Islam > Shihan wrote: >> I think another toggle flag ENABLE_REMOVE_SLASH_MODE (or any other >> appropriate name) can be added to the settings.py and setting that >> tlag to t

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

2009-06-16 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
I think another toggle flag ENABLE_REMOVE_SLASH_MODE (or any other appropriate name) can be added to the settings.py and setting that tlag to true will alter the existing APPEND_SLASH flag to be treated as prposed REMOVE_SLASH setting and act accordingly. In this way the existing APPEND_S

Re: append_slash alternative: remove_slash

2009-06-13 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
+1 I also like the remove_slash version of urls over the append_slash version as the trailing slash creates a directory structure illusion which is not true. Cheers Shihan On Jun 14, 2009, at 11:12 AM, donquixote wrote: > > Ok, I know similar questions have been asked about the trailing

Re: Accessing dictionaries in templates in a sorted manner

2009-06-11 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
There would be an easy work arround I think. As django support and encourage custom django tags and filters in apps, you might want to copy the existing code of current working dicsort filter into your own app, rename it to something different than "dicsort" and use that renamed filter in

Re: A Letter to the Authors of Web Authentication Libraries

2009-05-03 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
Exactly!! Besides the one way hashing algorithms, salt based algorithms are also not be feasible to go with this strategy. Thanx for clarifying this side aa well. Regards, M N Islam Shihan On May 3, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Elliott wrote: > > On May 3, 2:51 am, "M. N. Islam Shihan&quo

Re: A Letter to the Authors of Web Authentication Libraries

2009-05-03 Thread M. N. Islam Shihan
neway hashing alhorithm to encrypt password @ server side is not md5, that in turn will limit the versatile nature of choosing password encryption mechanism provided by a web development framework like django. Regards, M N Islam Shihan On May 3, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: &

Re: Is this true. that django really takes a lot of memory?

2009-02-17 Thread M N Islam Shihan
Hi, Please go through the comments of the blog post you are referring and you'll understand why, how and where to use the django ORM. Regards, Shihan - Original Message - From: "NitinHayaran" To: "Django developers" Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 6:40 PM Subject: Is this true. tha

Re: djangoproject.com/documentation/ redirected

2008-09-09 Thread M N Islam Shihan
Hi Adrian, I may not understanding what you are asking for, but if you are looking for the old 0.96 and 0.95 docs in the django old doc site, those are still there at locations below: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/0.96/ and http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/0.95/ But if

Re: ANNOUNCE: Django 1.0 released

2008-09-03 Thread M N Islam Shihan
+1 for Django +2 for the dev Team... Congrats Guys. You are doing great... Shihan - Original Message - From: "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:07 AM Subject: ANNOUNCE: Django 1.0 released > > The D

Re: Does CharField still required max_length? Or is it a bug?

2008-08-30 Thread M N Islam Shihan
Yes, it has been made optional with this syntax class CharField(* max_length=None*[, ***options*]) This is true for all other model fields as well that were expecting max_length parameter. Regards, Shihan On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:49 AM, guoqiang qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi,all > > I u