Re: Proposal for 1.3 - decoupling a few things in Django a bit.

2010-06-20 Thread M Rotch
called project/apps/xyz/business. Perhaps this isn't so bad. What's your thought. Am I over thinking this, or do you think my solution makes any more sense than after reading my previous post? Thanks Mark On Jun 20, 9:52 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:

Proposal for 1.3 - decoupling a few things in Django a bit.

2010-06-20 Thread M Rotch
I just have a few practical ideas that I want to lay out, pertaining to loose coupling. I've worked with Django for a while and one of the things I love is that you can do things your own way, instead of having the constricting requirements that "convention over configuration" brings (like in Rail

Proposal: Build complex-navigation helper

2010-06-03 Thread M Rotch
Building a site with more than 50 views tends to require some sort of sub-sub-page type of system in order to make for easy navigation. For instance: /eggs-view/ /eggs-view/sub-view/ /eggs-view/sub-view/sub-sub-view/ /spam-view/ /spam-view/spam-sub-view/ /spam-view/spam-sub-view/spam-sub-sub-view

Re: exception handling memory leak...

2010-06-03 Thread M Rotch
Thanks for your hard work Keven. There are those of us that appreciate input. On Jun 2, 4:25 pm, Kevin Howerton wrote: > This was not a "hey you guys are lazy", actually came across it ... > after I had fixed the same issue. > > I just posted a patch for you generated off trunk... and left a > ho