Hi,
When creating self.client in TestCase, it would be very useful if the
testcase instance was passed to the client.
I'm using a replacement client class that does various validation checks,
so wants to use assert* functions on TestCase, thus takes a testcase
instance as a parameter at creat
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:58:04 PM UTC, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Malcolm Box
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When creating self.client in TestCase, it would be very useful if the
>> testcase instance was passed to the
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Shai Berger wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2013, Malcolm Box wrote:
> >
> > The general pattern I want to implement is have a test client that makes
> > assertions about all the requests made during a set of tests. For
> example,
> >
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:59:55 UTC+1, Piotr Gosławski wrote:
>
> I was fixing my little helper function to behave more like Sean's and I
> think I've found a bug in locmem. Could you please take a look at this:
>
> Either I'm missing something or has_key() is not working correctly for
> keys w
Ticket filed and pull request for fix
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/22606
On 9 May 2014 10:38, Malcolm Box wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:59:55 UTC+1, Piotr Gosławski wrote:
>>
>> I was fixing my little helper function to behave more like Sean's and I
&g
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 17:41:53 UTC+1, Ramiro Morales wrote:
>
> For this particular change I'd go with what Moayad proposes but
> without the backward compatibility command line switch (assuming it
> actually enhance the reloadind responsiveness).
>
>
>
I've tried the 1-liner version here
FWIW, I think the main objection is to the word "slave", not to "master".
Otherwise we'll be renaming the git branches soon...
So "master" / "replica" would work.
Malcolm
On Thursday, 5 June 2014 16:26:07 UTC+1, Justin Holmes wrote:
>
> I think I agree that "primary" is a bad choice. Can you s
At the risk of re-opening this thread, I have just run into a very similar
situation (see https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25374) and find that
having the errors printed to the console is actually helpful - as I've had
to silence errors to get the correct code to run, seeing if there's any
Hi,
Raising this here as suggested by Tim on this
bug: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25374, with discussion also on
django users
here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-users/lsDP5oUWOsw
The underlying bug is that ModelAdmin checks are run against the class not
the instan
On Monday, 1 August 2016 13:56:55 UTC+1, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> > On 30 Jul 2016, at 23:15, Donald Stufft >
> wrote:
> >
> > See #6 of
> https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
>
>
> I’m aware of this article. It's a entertaining read but, unlike
breaking a form seems as likely with 60 as 255?
Cheers,
Malcolm
On 2 August 2016 at 12:26, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello Malcolm,
>
> > On 02 Aug 2016, at 10:28, Malcolm Box wrote:
> >
> > Having read the W3C Q&A carefull
://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAABi-DoVpZoTCKL9Mw-J%3DrSJhHFR1jo-WCr9gTVAa%2BBKWbsCjQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAABi-DoVpZo
I've opened ticket 26993 to track this -
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26993#ticket
On Friday, 29 July 2016 12:15:43 UTC+1, Raony Guimaraes Corrêa Do Carmo
Lisboa Cardenas wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> For a long time I was having problems to login to djangopackages.com
> using my gith
code is a three-line patch (and 5 lines of test code)
https://github.com/mbox/django/commit/c0a5fa22770b90d3ad0fd24ee80b93bebe03fbec
Can this be reconsidered for re-opening? I'm happy to improve the patch if
that's needed.
Cheers,
Malcolm
--
Malcolm Box
--
You received this message beca
Hi,
I think there's a potential to make this opt-in, and improve the out-of-box
experience.
Summarising the discussion, it seems that the rough consensus is that if we
were building the ORM from scratch, then this would be entirely sensible
behaviour (with necessary per-QS ways to disable) - i
15 matches
Mail list logo
