Re: two-phase commit / distributed transaction

2016-12-02 Thread Mateusz Mikołajczyk
ns on MySQL + > MyISAM. > > Best regards, > > -- > Aymeric. > > On 2 Dec 2016, at 20:43, Mateusz Mikołajczyk <mikolajcz...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > Well, I suppose that it would either lead to very obfuscated > implementation code, or very weird syntax

Re: two-phase commit / distributed transaction

2016-12-02 Thread Mateusz Mikołajczyk
, 2 grudnia 2016 14:32:51 UTC+1 użytkownik Patryk Zawadzki napisał: > > W dniu piątek, 2 grudnia 2016 12:05:11 UTC+1 użytkownik Mateusz > Mikołajczyk napisał: >> >> What would you say about checking which CRUD operations were executed >> within atomic() call (in order

Re: two-phase commit / distributed transaction

2016-12-02 Thread Mateusz Mikołajczyk
What would you say about checking which CRUD operations were executed within atomic() call (in order to serialize them and save into a special model for databases which don't support this functionality) ? Is it realistic? What I mean by that is that when you do: from django.db import

two-phase commit / distributed transaction

2016-12-01 Thread Mateusz Mikołajczyk
Hello, fellow devs. I have been googling intensively in order to see whether somebody already raised such issue, but so far I have been unsuccesful. Therefore, trembling on my legs, I decided to write to the devlist as suggested in the docs. I am trying to extend the atomic decorator / context