Re: Master/slave trolling pull request accepted to django master branch

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
I think a lot of recent changes in the language are harmful. Many common, short, clear, and concise words and phrases are being replaces with long, vague, sterile versions. Not only in the IT field, but everywhere. Black people refer to themselves "a person of color", and then even shorten it: P

Re: "Master/slave terminology"

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
ctive for any of the current slaves. Not even single slave's life was in any way improved by a free person complaining about a server being called "slave". On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:16:27 AM UTC+7, Alex_Gaynor wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM,

Re: "Master/slave terminology"

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
I think it makes more sense to count reasonable arguments of both sides, not the people who thumb up in the comments (by the way, those who thumb up are mostly Americans, isn't that discrimination?) If using the word "slave" is immediately associated with racism, it's a sign that we might have t

Re: "Master/slave terminology" (was: Master/slave trolling pull request accepted to django master branch)

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
It seems to be, there are enough reasonable people leaving comments like this one: https://github.com/django/django/pull/2720#issuecomment-44296843 On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:47:02 PM UTC+7, Daniele Procida wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014, Meira > wrote: > > >> This second

Re: "Master/slave terminology" (was: Master/slave trolling pull request accepted to django master branch)

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
> > This second commit was discussed in a Trac ticket and everyone (even you!) > was welcome to give their opinion. > That's all nice and good, but why is the discussion taking the course of whether or not we're accepting the second commit? It is clearly better than the first. The question is

Re: "Master/slave terminology" (was: Master/slave trolling pull request accepted to django master branch)

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
r be "too late" :) On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 8:44:13 PM UTC+7, Daniele Procida wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014, Meira > wrote: > > >Sorry, I accidentally sent a private reply :) I'll try to repeat it here > >for others. > > I have replied, privately, bu

Re: "Master/slave terminology" (was: Master/slave trolling pull request accepted to django master branch)

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
ng words that pinpoint exactly what I mean. On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:35:26 PM UTC+7, Daniele Procida wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014, Meira > wrote: > > >As some of you may have notice, a hot discussion is happening in the > >comments of this pull request: https://g

Master/slave trolling pull request accepted to django master branch

2014-05-27 Thread Meira
As some of you may have notice, a hot discussion is happening in the comments of this pull request: https://github.com/django/django/pull/2692 Essentially, this pull request suggests that all occurences of master/slave be replaced with leader/follower. While this is clearly insane, a less jaw-dr