Re: Still no favicon - Re: Visual recognition of Django website

2007-10-04 Thread Mikkel Høgh
On Oct 4, 5:41 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the ticket was closed by a lead developer, and the decision has so > far survived many other people begging and pleading on the mailing > list, it's a safe bet that continuing that process is not likely to > lead to a favorable

Re: Still no favicon - Re: Visual recognition of Django website

2007-10-04 Thread Mikkel Høgh
On Oct 4, 3:15 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is now just getting rude. > > There are over 700 open bugs. If nobody is against fixing them, why are > they still open? Why hasn't anything happened yet? The horrors! Oh, > wait, maybe it's that thing where we take small,

Still no favicon - Re: Visual recognition of Django website

2007-10-04 Thread Mikkel Høgh
If no one is against this, why hasn't anything happened yet? If Jacob, or anyone else, is against it, I wish they would step forward and say so. Perhaps even argue as to why. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Visual recognition of Django website

2007-09-23 Thread Mikkel Høgh
That is really good. Thanks :) On Sep 19, 1:44 pm, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree that a favicon is one of those fit-and-finish touches that helps > complete a website. Attached are my attempts. I agree with Todd that > "dj" is a better reminder of Django, and the color

Re: Visual recogintion of Django website

2007-09-15 Thread Mikkel Høgh
Well, I do that all the time, and I know that there are others like me :) It's a part of my GTD thing. Instead of having my RSS-reader grow to hundreds (even thousands) of unread posts, I go through it all frequently and open everything worth reading in a new tab. If I don't manage to get it