Re: Replacing the contrib.sites Site model with a setting?

I don't think its feasible to move away from db model entirely. Widely used packages like django CMS rely on there being a site model. On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 2:45:02 PM UTC-6, Tim Graham wrote: > > In another thread about adding a "scheme" field to the Site model [1], I > floated the

Performance limits for large number of sites? (tenants/saas offering)

I love how Django CMS handles the concept of "pages", breaking them into placeholders/plugins with a nice workflow, while deferring data modelling to Django. I am considering using it for a SaaS offering, in which each tenant would get their own "site". So there would be hundreds, possibly