Re: Custom Groups model and interoperability

s a Best Practice, would it be likely to be accepted? Thanks, Scot On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 9:46:35 PM UTC-7 Scot Hacker wrote: > Thanks very much for the response Aymeric. Seems like a bit of a gray area > that could use some form of recommendation - like in a "Best Practices&quo

Re: Custom Groups model and interoperability

x27;t provide a meaningful level of > interoperability. The semi-official position on this is "there is no > reasonable way to do pluggable templates". > > On 5 Oct 2021, at 19:13, Scot Hacker wrote: > > > No official (or semi-official) position on this? Is &qu

Re: Custom Groups model and interoperability

No official (or semi-official) position on this? Is "The right way to create custom Groups" simply undefined in Django? Thanks. On Sunday, October 3, 2021 at 10:27:36 PM UTC-7 Scot Hacker wrote: > I asked this question on django-users and got no response. Thought I might >

Custom Groups model and interoperability

I asked this question on django-users and got no response. Thought I might have better luck getting an "official" opinion on this here. You can call blocks in your templates anything you like, but if you intend to share your software with the world, you'd better use `{% block content %}` if you

Re: Proposal to format Django using black

Just bringing this up for the sake of thoroughness: NOTE: This is a beta product *Black* is already successfully used by several projects, small and big. It also sports a decent test suite. However, it is still very new. Things will probably be wonky for a while. This is made explicit by the "B

Re: GSOC Proposal (Bundler for Django)

On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 6:03:29 AM UTC-7, Ashik Meerankutty wrote: > > Please review and comment my draft proposal for GSOC 2019 > Draft > > Ashik's proposal is more along the lines of a gen

Re: New Password Validators

Rather than enforce an arbitrary set of password construction rules, I prefer systems that gauge password strength as an overall entropy score, then let sites establish the minimum overall strength they require. How that strength is achieved is up to each user - uou can either go short and ran

Re: GLOBAL_PERMS

On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 1:32:21 AM UTC-8, Curtis Maloney wrote: > > > So, after a discussion with a new user on #django today I decided to > make "permissions not bound to models" a first-class feature. > I'd recommend that anyone working on such a feature take a good look at django

Re: Replacing the contrib.sites Site model with a setting?

+1 for this change. This issue bites our team every time we copy a db from production to dev or stage or local, and certain features break because of the mis-pointed Sites setting. ./s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contri

Re: structural & functional review of django documentation

The written quality of the Django docs has been a selling point for years, but discoverability has never been great. I wanted to add two notes: 1) The front page of the docs says docs are organized into four sections (Tutorials, Topic Guides, Reference Guides, How-To Guides). And it's been pro

Re: Django dashboard packages?

On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 6:17:00 PM UTC-8, Allison A. wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get an idea of what dashboard packages Django developers > prefer or are using instead of the out-of-the-box admin. > > > 1) "Dashboard" could mean literally hundreds of different things. 2) This is