, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 22:01 -0700, simonbun wrote:
> > Maybe it could be useful to add a description to this list. This would
> > make things clear for new people using the Google Groups web
> > interface
Maybe it could be useful to add a description to this list. This would
make things clear for new people using the Google Groups web
interface. Just an example: http://groups.google.com/group/notmm-discuss/topics
. I've also seen some groups with a red warning box at the top, but I
can't seem to fi
Hi Marty,
Looks like you've done some decent work here, kudos. Having worked
with django and file uploading quite a bit in the past and knowing the
difficulty involved I'd be happy to see this go into trunk when it is
finalized. (the same goes for django-settings by the way, which I use
in all of
Great work Malcolm! Another big milestone reached towards one point
oh!
I ran into a strange situation converting my code though. My models
returned bytestrings instead of unicode in my code, but not in my
shell. After some poking around I found that I had to remove all my
*.pyc files from my pro
Good stuff! Can't wait to start using newforms-admin outside of my
sandbox...
Thanks for the work!
regards,
Simon
On Jun 8, 9:30 am, "Joseph Kocherhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 6/7/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hmm, policy reminds me of a few pages of text with legal mumbo jumbo,
like an acceptable use policy.
We can go for something technical, like values, properties, entries,
constraints, presets, ... or maybe it's time for something completely
different. Let's call them "tefkav"s, as in, "The Entitie
maybe some good comes from that.
On May 25, 5:08 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I thought tagging and reporting the spam to Google would help.
>
> To report spam to Google, us
Sorry, I thought tagging and reporting the spam to Google would help.
On May 25, 8:09 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 5/25/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you please stop doing this. We are aware of the spam problem
On May 25, 5:50 am, rawebadvert3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Resumes and CV's examples written by people in the industry. They are
> the ones who know best what to write in a resume for that industry.
> High Tech people writing technical resumes and CV examples, and
> Teachers writing and advis
Maybe it's a good idea to human-filter these things out? Feel free to
pitch in :-)
On May 20, 9:30 pm, "Moona Naeem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Legitimate" Online Paid Survey Scams Revealed Part 1
>
> Are you looking for scam-free and legitimate online paid surveys, free
> membership online pa
Maybe it's a good idea to human-filter these things out? Feel free to
pitch in :-)
On May 21, 11:03 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Meet Singles In Your Area
> Arabs, American, Russian, Asian, Filipino, French, German, Indian,
> Italian, Lesbians Singles From All Over The Wor
Maybe it's a good idea to human-filter these things out? Feel free to
pitch in :-)
On May 21, 9:10 pm, "Moona Naeem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Mark Warren's Ultimate Wealth Package Worth the Money?
>
> You could go take a college course in marketing or entrepreneurship at
> your local unive
> enjoying it!
I am, thanks for sharing it. In my opinion it really deserves a spot
in the default contrib apps.
regards,
Simon
>
> -Gul
>
> On May 16, 2:26 am, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Gulopine,
>
> > I've been testing your contrib a
Hi Gulopine,
I've been testing your contrib and I'm liking it so far. Finding a
suitable name is quite difficult...At the moment I'm calling them
'presets' in my code, but that may be a bit too generic.
As an aside: what do you think about adding a 'choices' parameter to
relevant ValueTypes? The
What if we would make the 'decimal_places' argument illegal for the
new FloatField? That exception would make the change impossible to
miss. Hope I'm not missing anything obvious with this idea, it just
popped into my head.
On May 14, 11:25 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I ha
"Now, one of the coolest parts of the newforms admin work is that you
can easily override methods of the admin class to change the behavior
of the admin."
This feature alone will solve so many of the past problems I've faced
using the admin contrib. When this gets implemented it will truly feel
l
ld be appreciated
Regards,
Simon
On Feb 12, 4:47 pm, "simonbun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering how hard it would be to build this kind of reverse
> edit_inline functionality into the admin contrib. It would open up
> some basic model inheritance possib
I'm wondering how hard it would be to build this kind of reverse
edit_inline functionality into the admin contrib. It would open up
some basic model inheritance possibilities if used in combination with
generic relations.
Personally I've not yet ventured into the django core libraries. Can
anyone
This would be a very good solution to the duplication of urls in
urlconf and other places throughout the code. Also, it would provide a
way to link to certain views, wich is useful, for instance to specify a
form action url.
However, this solution doesn't take generic views into account, and
tho
I think its a good idea.
If editable=False is specified in the model, then I personally would
expect it not to show up in the form_from_model form either.
On the other hand, I'm not so sure that the need to differentiate the
editable option between the admin contrib and plain form_from_model is
I've tried to use comments tags like that too. So just for comments
alone this seems like a good idea to me. If it doesn't interfere with
anything else of course.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dja
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 07:57 +0000, simonbun wrote:
> > I'm not so sure its such a bad idea to bundle a JS toolkit with the
> > framework.
>
> It's only been a month since the last time we had this thread. Do we
> have to do this a
I'm not so sure its such a bad idea to bundle a JS toolkit with the
framework.
Last time i checked, there's about 65Kb of custom JS in django already.
>From a first glance this is all functionality that can be found in most
JS toolkits. Right now, if i want to use a toolkit, i have to accept
its
23 matches
Mail list logo
