On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> On 12.09.2011, at 22:44, Carl Meyer wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> On 09/12/2011 12:04 AM, Gary Wilson Jr. wrote:
>>> I'm a fan of not requiring a models.py, as IMHO it
On 12.09.2011, at 22:44, Carl Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 09/12/2011 12:04 AM, Gary Wilson Jr. wrote:
>> I'm a fan of not requiring a models.py, as IMHO it shouldn't be any
>> different than other common files found in an app e.g. urls.py,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Actually, I think there's generally consensus that requiring models.py
> is not ideal.
Yeah, that sounds about right. I get bitten by missing models.py all
the time, and I should supposedly know better. It's lousy usability,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gary,
On 09/12/2011 12:04 AM, Gary Wilson Jr. wrote:
> I'm a fan of not requiring a models.py, as IMHO it shouldn't be any
> different than other common files found in an app e.g. urls.py,
> templatetags dir, etc. If I don't need any models for
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Justin Lilly wrote:
> Not sure why this particular ticket is marked as DDN, as it seems like
> a no-brainer. The patch provides a more clear error message when a
> user is attempting to load an app which doesn't have a models.py.
>
>
Not sure why this particular ticket is marked as DDN, as it seems like
a no-brainer. The patch provides a more clear error message when a
user is attempting to load an app which doesn't have a models.py.
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7198
https://github.com/django/django/pull/39
Happy to