Please, first read the whole message thoroughly before going into the
prima balerina mode. I really appreciate your volunteer time work and
the need to control the chaos and would like to help out respecting
that. "Submission rejected as potential spam (BlogSpam says content is
spam
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, trybik wrote:
> Hi Łukasz,
>
> On Apr 4, 8:43 pm, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>> It's best to report bugs on the tracker. Otherwise, they'll die in
>> infinite depths of everyone's mailboxes.
>
> that sounds like too much
Hi Łukasz,
On Apr 4, 8:43 pm, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
> It's best to report bugs on the tracker. Otherwise, they'll die in
> infinite depths of everyone's mailboxes.
that sounds like too much hassle for me. Please, feel free to report
this. Here's the "safe" patch:
diff -rupN
Hi Mikołaj,
On 4 April 2011 19:46, trybik wrote:
> Omg, I've just reviewed this bug, it's still there but this message is
> completely confusing. A little correction:
It's best to report bugs on the tracker. Otherwise, they'll die in
infinite depths of everyone's
Omg, I've just reviewed this bug, it's still there but this message is
completely confusing. A little correction:
On 25 Lut, 14:14, trybik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when generating sql forWhereNoderepresented as (AND:
> (EverythingNode)),
>